My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE48502
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE48502
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:50:27 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 1:38:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981034
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/31/1981
Section_Exhibit Name
APPENDIX C Nickens & Associates - Archaeological Survey 8/81
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />1 <br />' Historic <br /> Baker (1978) has proposeda three-phase chronology regarding the <br /> historic resources for the North Fork vicinity of the Gunnison River <br />' Valley in Colorado which includes the project area. The earliest <br /> phase, dating from 1600 to 1376, has been termed the Phase of <br />' Intermittent Exploration and Indian/White Interaction. From 1876 <br />to the 1890s is the Phase of Primary Settlement and Extensive Land <br /> Exploitation. Baker (1978) concludes that the major cultural <br /> tradition in this phase was ranching. <br />' <br /> The last phase, the Phase of Urbanization and Intensive Land <br /> Exploitation, dates from the 1890s to the 1920s. During this time <br /> period the cultural traditions included coal mining, fruit ranching, <br /> urban growth, stock ranching and farming (Baker 1978:18). It is quite <br /> probable that most of Lhe historic resources in the project area fall <br />' into this temporal placement. No historic components were located <br />in the transects selected for the 10~ sample; however, some are kno~•~n <br /> to exist (Figure 3)• BL11 archaeologist Doug Scott of the Montrose <br /> District (personal communication), has inforrned us that t~•ro early <br />' land patents were taken out in the project area. The earliest of <br /> these may date in the late 1890s. <br />' There is a wide range of archaeological site types that could be <br />located in the project area. Hibbets, et al. (1979) define twelve <br />such site types including: open lithic scatters, chipped and ground <br />stone scatter, primary reduction scatter/lithic source area, secondary <br />reduction scatter, chipped stone scatter/undifferentiated, outcrop <br />face lithic sites, rock shelters, rock art, ~•~ickiups, game traps, <br />isolated hearths and Euro-American historic. <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.