My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO20111
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO20111
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:41:30 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 1:21:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
11/8/2004
Doc Name
Concerns on Discharges & Effect on Fire Mountain Canal (CO 0044776)
From
Bureau of Reclamation
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
blank documents. therefore, all legal documents fi.e., .icenses, Dorms ts, 06M <br />agreements) used to autno r~.e the discharge of urban storm water into existing <br />Reclamation facilities shall be submitted individually for formal legal review <br />and aoproval by the Field Solicitor's Offices. <br />12. Unlicensed Discharoes: Unauthorized discharge into Reclamation <br />facilities is illegal and must be considered either as trespass on fee title <br />lands or as unreasonable interference with Reclamation's right to use and <br />enjoy its easements. Either situation is grounds for legal action, such as <br />seekinq~injunctive relief and/or filing a lawsuit to recover costs. Due to <br />funding and staffing constraints, identification of trespass/interference <br />situations will probably occur reactively rather than proactively. However, <br />for liability reasons, it is strongly recommended that all Unlicensed <br />discharges on a particular Reclamation facility be resolved before any new <br />discharge into that same facility is authorized. Regardless of the location <br />or source, whenever Unlicensed discharges are discovered, Reclamation should: <br />a. Identify the location of trespass or interference. <br />b. Identify the scope of Reclamation's land ownership rights. <br />c. Seek a remedy. T_n order to minimize its liability, Reclamation <br />should notify the violator immediately to cease and desist. The violator <br />should be given an opportunity to apply for authorisation through a process <br />similar to those who are not already in trespass. Sack charges could be <br />assessed if the duration of the trespass/interference can be documented. <br />Reclamation has the right to plug outfalls which are in trespass to force <br />compliance with the standards. Repeat violators should be prosecuted. <br />d. when the violator is a private, rather than a public entity (a <br />developer rather than a city), every effort should be made to authorize the <br />discharge through a local governmental entity rather than a private entity <br />with costs and fees being assessed as previously discussed. <br />e. Report violators to appropriate Federal/state regulatory agency, <br />and request their assistance. Unless the discharges involve toxic materials, <br />such regulatory agencies may decline to give assistance. Reclamation may have <br />to resolve most of the violations itself, but at least Reclamation will be on <br />record as having notified the proper authorities. <br />EXCEPTIONS: <br />1. All provisions of this policy are subject to analysis under <br />Secretarial Order No. 3175, dated November 8, 1993, 'covering Zndian Trust <br />Assets. As appropriate under Secretarial Order No. 3175, exceptions to these <br />standards may be granted when processing applications from Native American <br />groups. <br />2. Other case-specific problems which do not readily fit the standards <br />and guidance provided herein and requests for exceptions to these standards <br />should be referred to the regional office. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.