My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE47558
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE47558
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:49:34 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 1:12:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
X199920506
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/20/1999
Doc Name
DOW Comment Letter
From
DOW
To
MONTGOMERY WATSON MINING GROUP
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• ~ <br />w <br />The upland area will also incur a degree of impacts due to the proposed project. The most severe <br />impacts to the existing wildlife habitat will result at those proposed drill site locations and at any <br />sites where road construction is necessary. This is due to duect habitat loss. The increase in use <br />and human activity in the area will result in minimal to moderate impacts to those species located <br />throughout this area. However, due to the nature of the proposed activity, most species will <br />adapt fairly readily to the disturbances through modification of their forage habits and existing <br />movement corridors. <br />Due to the concentration of lek sites in the proposed area, Columbian sharp-tailed grouse will <br />probably be impacted to the greatest extent by this proposed project. PDH9901, PDH9902, <br />PDH9903 will most likely have the most significant impact to this specie, as they are located in <br />closest proximity to active Columbian sharp-tailed grouse lek sites. <br />I feel that the negative impacts of this proposed could be relatively minimal as it pertains to the <br />majority of the wildlife utilizing this area, especially if a few restrictions are considered. <br />O Use existing roads whenever possible to mi~;~~E new road construction. Assuming <br />additional road construction is necessary, when possble, use a minim,tm of a 100' setback <br />from Trout Creek and Middle Creek. Follow standard and/or required reclamation <br />procedures once roads are no longer needed. <br />m If poss,'ble, eliminate the eeed for stream crossings. Assuming stream crossing <br />construction is necessary, adequate stream bank stabilization efforts must be made. <br />Exposed banks should be seeded and/or planted with willow cuttings, or with cuttings <br />from an alternative and suitable native riparian shrub, immediately. <br />® All stockpiled fill material should be stabilized and stored in locations at a sufficient <br />distance to either minimize or eliminate the potential for sediment runoff into Trout and <br />Middle Creeks. <br />O Follow standard and/or requved reclamation procedures once project completed. <br />The following are suggestions on ways to posably minimize any negative impacts that this <br />development might have on the existing wildlife habitat in the upland area. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.