My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE47344
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE47344
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:49:23 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 1:07:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
1990/1992 Vegetation Baseline Report
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 10 Attachment 10-1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RESULTS <br />Vegetation Mapping (Exhibit 10-1, Sheets 1 and 2) <br />Vegetation was mapped by Vern Piannenstiel of PWCC prior to the beginning of field work in both <br />years' studies. This mapping was ground-truthed by ESCO and PWCC during spring floral surveys <br />in June 1990 (toast Baseline Study Area) and site reconnaissance in July 1992 (toast <br />Supplemental Study Area); refinements to the mapping were made at those times. <br />Veggsation Types <br />Seven vegetation types were identified and six sampled in 1990 within the toast Baseline Study <br />Area. These vegetation types were; Aspen, Mountain Brush, Steep Mountain Brush (qualitatively <br />described in 1990, quantitatively sampled in 1992), Sagebrush, Western Wheatgrass /Alkali <br />Sagebrush, Mesic Drainage, and Improved Pasture - Subirrigated. The latter type consists of <br />valley bottom areas with natural subirrigation that have had native vegetation replaced with <br />introduced species for improved biomass production. Within the Aspen vegetation type, tree cover <br />varied from a dense closed canopy to that provided by widely spaced trees; thus, both forest and <br />woodland tree patterns existed; for simplicity, the unit will be referred to simply as the Aspen <br />• vegetation type. <br />In the toast Supplemental Study Area, the same seven types listed above occurred, along with four <br />additional types including Alkali Meadow, Alkali Sagebrush / Greasewood, Improved Pasture - <br />Upland, and Conservation Reserve Program Lands. <br />Cover, frequency and species density data from quantitative sampling in the toast Baseline Study <br />Area are presented in Tables Al through A6 (Appendix A), while those data from the toast <br />Supplemental Study Area are presented in Tables B1 through 811 (Appendix B). Production data <br />and statistics from quantitative sampling in the toast Baseline Study Area are presented in Tables <br />A7 through A12, while those from the toast Supplemental Study Area are presented in Tables 612 <br />through B16. Shrub /Tree density data and statistics from the toast Baseline Study Area are <br />presented in Tables A13 through A18, while those data from the toast Supplemental Study Area are <br />presented in Tables B17 through B25 . Tables A19 and B26 summarize the cover, production and <br />shrub density statistics for the toast Baseline Study Area and toast Supplemental Study Area, <br />respectively. Tables A20 and 827 similarly summarize, for the two areas, the relative vegetation <br />cover statistics, by life form, for all six types. Tables A21 and B26 are summaries of species <br />• density and top-layer cover by lifeform for the baseline and supplemental areas. Tables A22 and <br />B29 present the sample adequacy estimates for cover, production, and shrub density. Tables A23 <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.