My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE47344
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE47344
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:49:23 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 1:07:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
1990/1992 Vegetation Baseline Report
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 10 Attachment 10-1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
cover sample was also taken). All woody plants, including seedlings, with root crowns found <br />within the quadrat boundaries were tabulated by species and by life stages as follows: <br />seedling, mature, or dead. For shrubs that sprout from along-lived root system, such as <br />snowberry (~ymohoricarpos rotundifolius), serviceberry (Amelanchier alnifolial, <br />Gambel's oak (Duercus gambeliil, and chokecherry (Padus virginiana ssp. melanocaroal, <br />individuals were counted as 'clumps' that appeared to originate from the same central root <br />system. For these species, the actual number of individuals present in a stand of woody <br />shoots is highly debatable and such determinations inevitably vary between observers, <br />introducing more variance into already variable sample data. Quaking aspen ( ulus <br />tremuloides) were counted as individual stems, even though it is well known that the trees <br />within thousands of square meters of a typical aspen stand may represent the root sprouts of <br />very few or even a single individual. <br />Plant Species Frequency and Dengj!)f Measurements <br />During the course of cover sampling, all plant species occurring within one meter on either <br />side of the cover transact were noted on the cover data sheets. Frequency for each plant <br />species observed during sampling was calculated by dividing the number of sample transacts <br />in which the species was observed by the total number of samples. As such, this value may <br />be mare correctly termed 'constancy.' Relative vegetation cover was calculated by dividing <br />the absolute cover of each species by the total vegetation cover and expressing the result as a <br />percent. <br />The total number of species (within each lifeform) observed in each sample provide a <br />measure of 'species density', in the units of number of species per 100 sq.m. These <br />measures provide an indication of relative species richness. <br />Plant Species Llsting <br />During the course of the field work, a list of all encountered plant species (quantitatively <br />plus incidental observations) was compiled. Scientific names used follow Weber and <br />Wittman (1992); common names cited may be found in Beetle (1970), Nickerson et al. <br />(1976), or SCS (1979). Cross reference to the substantially revised scientific <br />nomenclature for the flora of Western Colorado, as set forth by Weber (1987), may be <br />determined by reference to Weber and Wittman (1992). Of plant species observed, only <br />Canada thistle (Cirsium arvensel, yellow toadflax (Linaria vulgaris), whitetop (Cardaria <br />• drabal, and common bindweed (Convolvulus arvensisl are listed state-wide as noxious <br />weeds (Thornton et al. 1974). Blue lettuce (Lactuca pulchella), pennycress (Thlasoi <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.