Laserfiche WebLink
Section 779.21 (a) Continued. <br />• (Dollhopf., et. al., 1977) report that the suspect level for this <br />element i~ greater than 0.3 ppm. Gough and Shacklette (1976) state <br />"there ore no recorded instances of a field, occurence of molybdenum <br />toxicity to plants". On the basis of these conclusions there is no <br />reason to believe any deficiencies or toxicities are likely to be <br />encountered in the permit area with respect to molybdenum. <br />Soils Resources Summary. All of the chemical and physical data <br />collected to date on the permit area demonstrate that no elemental <br />toxicities or deficiencies erist. Almost all topsoils within the <br />permit area are ranked "good" for reclamation under the current <br />topsoil ranking standards. <br />(b) Where the applicant proposes to use selected overburden materials <br />as a supplement or substitute for topsoil, the application shall provide <br />results of the analyses, trials, and tests required under 30 CFR 816.22. <br />• No overburden materials will be substituted for topsoil nor will <br />topsoil be supplemented with such materials. All existing areas <br />requiring topsoil removal have adequate topsoil to comply with the <br />requirements of 30 CFR 816.11. <br />Section 779.22 Land-use information. <br />(a) The application shall contain a statement of the condition, capa- <br />bility, and productivity of the land within the proposed permit area, <br />including-- <br />(1) A map and supporting narrative of the uses of the land existing at <br />the time of the filing of the application. If the premising use of the <br />land was changed within 5 years before the anticipated date of beginning <br />the proposed operations, the historic use of the land shall also be <br />described. <br />• <br />779-301 <br />