Laserfiche WebLink
,. ~ , <br />Church Pit//79*45 ~~ ? '~,,.,'. <br />April 23. 1979 <br />~`~f <br />4) Please provide information concerning the occurrenu end <br />depth of groundwbte* in the-~vlclnl of the mires. is water <br />present In dither the LarasrFe OP.<~ Poxhills sandstones? <br />F. . <br />Exhibit 1: <br />1) Please prot•ide Boll ana)ysr''~ata from the proposed Stage 1 and <br />Stage 11 pit areas. These analyses should address the <br />,~~ suttabillty of the soil for revegststion, both the surface and <br />subsoil layers. Degree of varlabl,llty In the thickness of the <br />soil horizons should also be addwseyd. <br />2) Any statement made in Edl~t~ 9 concerning the depth do which <br />topsoil will be salvsgit~"ilust be substantiated by data <br />prov(ded in this section. <br />3) The statement made on page 9 that "(the aolis) ere so poor In <br />nutrients that vegetation is Beverly restricted: did not seem <br />to be supported by our recent on-site inspectlan. <br />4) If the applicant wishes to use ovebburden materials instead <br />of soil for reclamation for part of the Phase 0 area, then <br />the applicant must submit an analysis of this material in <br />this section to demonstrate that it is sulteble for sustaining <br />r~rr+~ vegetation, preferably more suitable than the native topsoil <br />~ (see Rule 6.4 f). <br />~~,r~ Exh I b I t J <br />1) How mere the estimates of cover and productivity of undisturbed <br />`~° areas determined7 <br />-5- <br />2) We recommend that in order to allay for the eventual determination <br />7 `` of the success of revegetatlon, reference areas in tbb surrounding <br />b `3~1 undisturbed areas shouiJdbe established at this time. <br />Exhibit L: <br />i) Please explain why reclamation costs were submitted only for <br />Phases 1 and 11, The statement that Phases 2 and 22 will <br />require the greatest amount of reclamation work seems unlikely, <br />slot' the reclamation map shows that sssentlally the entire <br />13 acres in Phase ` will require regrading and shaping. <br />2) If the Intention of the applicant in submitting costs only <br />for Phases 1 and it was to request a floating bond, then aTi <br />disturbance muse be eiassifled as maJor, abderate or minor <br />(see Exhibit D, Part d); and the applicant oust commit to a <br />maximum ?umber of acres which may be In any one category et <br />any particular time. <br />3) The applicant should provide additional information concerning <br />the souras of the cost per acre figures. la patticular, <br />please Justify the estimate of one hour per care as adequate <br />'for both drilling tM seed mixture end crimping the mulch. <br />Similarly, the estimate of two hours, per acre for backfllling, <br />slops grading and reshaping needs additional alp~if(catloa. <br />,:. <br />4. <br />\,. , <br />~` <br />~ .. <br />,~ <br />`.. <br />~.' . <br />,~. <br />