Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Church Pit/179-115 <br />Apr11 23, 1979 <br />~~; <br />~,:. <br />~~ ~ x v <br />f" <br />^ . <br />~}i;€ <br />Species <br />,.- -4- <br />`; <br />~,;~ <br />;~', . . <br />LeS. P.L.S. Psr Acra <br />Thidcspike Wheatgriay '~..'.. 1.5 <br />Craws vetch or elydfoot <br />Trefoil 1.0 <br />Hative Forbs i',0 <br />Tha native fortis c41~Y! include a mixture of tM following species, <br />as avellabte: Galtl to arlstata, lie Farlsll, Partstaaxm sAP•, <br />Ds lea purpuream, Ratib da w~sra nlcii ooee--Tnaa, Llatrls <br />ctata, Lupine spp. other natives un, ad to-'tTie I~st, as <br />sdi tred. <br />1~) 10) Moisture condidlons in this ana •ra iYah"tJSat • fal:i seeding Is <br />i preferable. Spring seeding would proba(SIy ba less sucussful. <br />11) Since one of the stated post-~ntng land sue, is as "habitat for <br />non-critical wildlife," the eppllcant must.a?~(diess Rule 6.3(b). <br />The seed mixture recamKnded by the staff aliould, howawr, msbt <br />the requirement of encouraging the divars`jty of wildlife species. <br />12) Please submit a plan for stabiilzing topsoll~stockpllas, using <br />vegetative cover or other means (Rule 6,~•;a,~. <br />13) 11hat measures will be taken to ensure ids stsbiilty of replaced <br />topsoil (Rule 6.4 e)7 <br />14) How will weeds be controlled to the r~vay~tatad areas (Rule 6.5 f)? "•:~: <br /> ~_, ,. <br />Exhibit G: <br />lj The mining and reciamatton plans Indicate that them will be <br /> signlfiunt aarthmoving activities close!°than 200 feet to eha <br /> Church and McKay ditches. These ditches rpuld quatlfy as <br /> "significant, valuable and permanent ewp.~da: structures <br /> (115(4)(d))." Therefore, the applleanr<;saut Hach an agreement ~ <br /> with the ownero of the ditches. statln*:.ia~tl+ec.that the ditches <br /> will not be affected, or else that art.y Qas*gi to the ditches <br /> will ba wmpansatsd for by the operator. A copy of any <br /> agreement which Is roachad shduld be subeltttad to this office. =•` <br />; <br />=' <br /> r <br />:: <br />2) If the operator proposes In'the future to n-lxate the Church <br /> and McKay ditches, than the question of possible injury to _~:, <br /> existing water rights will need to ba addritsbd. <br /> <br />S) ~t*n to leave a large <br />Ths staff is connrnad about the prbposad <br /> _ <br />expanse of the Foxhllls sandstone expoaa~.le.lha final nclanwtlon. <br /> This Is a rachange so[wr for a format ton d-i6h is an layortant <br /> aquifer 1rt arose to the lest of this setae. Raoovtng the natural <br /> tovartng layars`.lrow this sandstone saetd axposf the aquifer to <br /> possible polisttt(ee, which saulA affdct grourtdvater quality at a <br /> eonstdarabli distanu frgs the wtina stN. TAts potentlai <br /> dasyar could ba roduaed bq ltavfi-g a la r of clay or the surface <br /> of ~y sandstorta {tM "yWlttty clay era !' .rhtcl+ was s»ntloned on <br /> <br />.. . , _ 1 <br />,py! 8, <br />1u1p11ift~~},~,. >N~J~ear-t sheul~ sddruts this concern. 1 <br />',.tr7dF ^.:.wi:tra: etc,. - . _. r <br />.. , ..i. ~. J~.~',' : ~~.. _... ._ _ ... ~' yt_ . ~: ~. <br />