Laserfiche WebLink
Permit Revision Adequacy Comment Response <br />November 30, 2004 <br />Page 9 of 24 <br />2.04.10 Vegetation <br />47. A vegetation map (Map 42) covering the entire permit area (including SOD extension area and <br />an adequate buffer area) at a scale of 1:24000 is included in the approved permit. In addition, <br />the approved permit contains an adequate lazger scale vegetation map (Map 43) covering the <br />azeas of approved disturbance, at a scale of 1:2400, with the approved historic record <br />vegetation study azea depicted on Map 53. There are no areas of proposed or approved surface <br />disturbance within the SOD extension azea. <br />Plant community descriptions as required by 2.04.10(4) were updated to include some <br />additional discussion regazding riparian communities and wetlands within the SOD extension <br />azea. <br />We have only two requests regarding the vegetation maps and narrative: <br />a) Map 42 will need to be amended to include the proposed SOD extended permit <br />boundary, as required by 2.10.1(3) (see comment #2). <br />b) A wet meadow community is described on amended page 2.04-142 and 2.04-143 as <br />occurring within the SOD extension area in places along the Dry Fork and Lick Creek. <br />The community does not appeaz to be delineated on Map 42, but it may be the case that <br />the wet meadows are inclusions located entirely within the boundaries of the riparian <br />vegetation community, which is delineated on the map along Dry Fork and Lick Creek. <br />Please clazify if this is the case, or amend the map as appropriate to delineate wet <br />meadow communities that occur outside the boundaries of the riparian community. <br />MCC Response: MCC has made the appropriate changes in the text, narrative, and map <br />to clarify the wet meadow community <br />48. On page 2.04-156 please include US Forest Service sensitive plant species to the list. <br />MCC Response: MCC added the USFS Sensitive Plant Species list. <br />2.04.11 Fish and Wildlife <br />49. A mine plan modification requires approval by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They are <br />concerned about potential increases in water depletion. Are any additional water depletions <br />anticipated from the proposed mine plan in PR-10? <br />MCC Response: No additional water depletions are anticipated. <br />M SO.On Table 26, page 2.04-160, please include wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo). <br />