My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE46736
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE46736
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:48:52 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 12:54:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
Surveys for Sites 5MF1960, 5MF2253, 5MF950 & 5MF2427
Section_Exhibit Name
Appendix K Part X to XII
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-7- <br />the early 1920'x. On 10-07-21, Emma Kneeland filed a homestead claim <br />(Enlarged Homestead Act) for the NEl/4, the NE1/4SW1/q, and the NW1/4SW1/4 of <br />Section 1, TSN, R91W. The claim was patented on 10-07-23 to "the heirs of <br />Claire Kneeland". On 10-28-39 the land was purchased from the Kneelands by <br />Viola K. Beaudoire. From this time on, the land upon which SMF1960 is <br />located changed ownership several times. Presently, the site area is owned <br />by Trapper Mining Inc. <br />Interpretations: Based upon the artifactual remains from the site and <br />information obtained from the title search, it is the opinion of the <br />investigator that the site dates no earlier than the 1920's and is asso- <br />ciated with homestead activities. Based upon [he physical remains, it is <br />not possible to determine if the site represents a seasonal livestock camp <br />or a year-round habitational site. <br />Evaluation: The site offers little potential for historical research, <br />interpretation or preservation. Beyond what data have been recovered, it <br />would appear that the site possesses little significance.on either a <br />• national, state or local level. <br />Recommendations: In the opinion of the investigator, no further work is <br />warranted at SMF1960 and the site is not recommended for eligibility to the <br />National Register of Historic Places. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.