My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE45861
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE45861
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:48:11 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 12:30:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2000080
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/3/2000
Doc Name
TECHNICAL ADEQUACY REVIEW OF RECLAMATION APPLICATION PN M-2000-080 PIONEER FARM
From
DMG
To
PIONEER SAND CO INC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />6) In order to comply with Rule 6.4.19 of the Construction Materials Rules and Regulations, either <br />compensation for any damage done to permanent structures must be agreed upon with the owners of <br />stmctures within 200'; a 200' excavation setback must be preserved; or a detailed engineering <br />geotechnical stability analysis, demonstrating the stability of the structures will not be affected by <br />excavation within 200', must be submitted. Please submit one of [he above documents for both the IKEA <br />power line and gas pipelines which cross the site. <br />Other Agency Comments: <br />Comment letters received from the Army Corps of Engineers and Office of the State Engineer did not include <br />any comments or difficulties with the current application. However, a letter received from the Division of <br />Wildlife requested clarific:a[ion of the disposition of a strip of grassland previously discussed with the <br />Operator (see attached). Please clarify what the final mining plan with regard to this grass strip is, and modify <br />the maps accordingly, if it is to be excluded from the mining operation. <br />Public Comments: <br />Additionally, comments from the law firm of Preeo, Silverman, Green and Egle, representing three residences <br />near the property, contained the following concerns, and are addressed below. <br />1) Topsoil. The actual topsoil depth at the site is only 4-6" per Gene Backhaus/NRCS West Arapahoe SCD, <br />not "... from 6-12 inches in depth" as stated in Exhibit D (~(i ). As the site is to be returned to dry land <br />agricultural use after mining, the soil depth is insufficient to permit the removal of topsoil from the site <br />for resale per Roben7_ebroski/State Soil Conservation Board and Daniel Parker/Consultant (Rules <br />3.1.1(1) and (2), 3.1.9(1) and (6), and 6.4.4(g) and 6.4.9(1)). References to the sale or resale of topsoil <br />should be eliminated in Exhibits C (e.g., sheet ~/, MINING EXCAVATION AND LAND LEVELING <br />OPERATIONS, Section 4, Paragraph 2 and 5) and D. <br />Reference Exhibits C (e.g., sheet t/<, MINING EXCAVATION AND LAND LEVELING OPERATIONS, <br />Section 4, Paragraph !)) and E, stipulate that sand mixed with sludge is an unacceptable topsoil substitute <br />or amendment (reference Gene Backhaus). Compost and/or chemical Fenilizers mixed with topsoil are <br />acceptable amendments (Rule 3.1.9(6) and (7)). <br />The Division has also asked that the Applicant's plans for the topsoil on the site be clarified, as stated <br />above, in Concern #1. While the resale of topsoil is not expressly forbidden, it is to be understood that <br />any deficit found at [he site will be calculated and the cost of purchasing additional topsoil would be <br />added into the reclamation costs for the site. <br />2) Water Usage and Retention. Reference Exhibit C (i.e., sheet t/a, WATER AND SEWAGE USAGE, <br />Section 9) D and E, include estimates of project water requirements and annual volumes for development, <br />mining, processing and reclamation phases (Rule 6.4.7(3)). Indicate the projected amount from each <br />source of water to supply project water requirements (Rule 6.4.7(4)). Outline plans for and locations of <br />any water retention ponds (Rules 3.1.6(I)(a) and (b), 3.1.6(2), 3.1.7 and 6.4.4(c)). <br />Establish agroundwater-monitoring program to establish baselines and to protect groundwater quality and <br />monitor groundwater level (Rules 3.1.5(10) and (1 I ), 3.1.6(l)(a) and (b) and 3.1.7). <br />Reference Exhibits C, D, and E include estimates for water consumption and plans for discharge and/or <br />retention (Rules 3.1.7(6)(b)(ii) and 3.1.7(2) and (4)). Mr. Phillips stated in the Arapahoe County meeting <br />that water would be required for screening and that water would be retained on some basis in retention <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.