My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE45518
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE45518
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:47:52 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 12:23:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 17 ROAD CERTIFICATION
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-2- <br />' at the base of hills in areas where grades are estimated to be flatter than <br />20 percent. Based on our personal observation at the mine and a review of <br />topographic maps provided, it does not appear that any haulage or access <br />road embankments have been constructed in areas where grades exceed 20 percent. <br />MRLB has requested that the applicant report maximum embankment slopes on <br />all embankment roads to allow the division to verify compliance with 4.031 <br />(3)(d)(ix) and 4.03.2 (3)(d)(vii) and to enable the Division to assess <br />stability and erasion potential of the slopes (Item G, Page 2). The per- <br />formance standards for the two mentioned sections require that embankment <br />fills be flatter than 1 vertical to 2 horizontal. One road embankment is <br />evident on Map IV-9. The embankment is located on an access road, outside <br />of the permit area, in the southeast quadrant. This slope is about 2 verti- <br />cal to 2 horizontal and about 20 feet in height on the downhill side. We <br />have observed that there are numerous embankments for haulage and access <br />roads which are not indicated on the topographic map. In general, these <br />embankments are less than 10 feet in height and are steeper than the maxi- <br />mum specified by the performance standards. <br />We understand that most of the roads within this mine area have been present <br />during the life of the mine (20+ years). At the time of our site visit, <br />no areas of instability were evident. We understand that embankment and cut <br />slopes have generally been performing satisfactorily. Based on our personal <br />observations at the mine site, there appears to be some cut slopes and road <br />embankment slopes which are steeper than specified by the Performance <br />Standards. Considering that these slopes have performed satisfactorily <br />over a number of years, we believe that the slopes are structurally stable. <br />We believe that the slopes will remain structurally stable provided slope <br />conditions do not change in the future. If the slopes are steepened by <br />undercutting or erosion, it is possible that some instability could develop. <br />We reco+rmiend that Empire Energy monitor all cut and embankment slopes <br />periodically for signs of instability. If some movement is observed, then <br />the slopes should be flattened. <br />If we can be of further service in discussing the contents of this letter, <br />the attached maps, or the mine from a geotechnical point of view, please call. <br />Very truly yours, <br />CTL/THOMPSON, INC. <br />By <br />am C. rtotrnrari rt;'Jr., Yro3¢ct tngineer <br />Reviewed by: <br />I8LL~/ ~Q`:~ •TH~~i,•p <br />A~~4~%~ _..,., Qom: •6`8~S^' ~J <br />President E • ~ <br />Robert W. Thompson, , <br />Y 7078 <br />WCH:RWT:kt • <br />.~ <br />(3 copies sent) 'rt~~~0,";;; •~,P~ <br />. f nF rn~~~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.