My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE45257
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE45257
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:47:38 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 12:16:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
AVF RECONNAISSANCE
Section_Exhibit Name
TAB 07 APPENDIX 7-7
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
State Reg. <br />• water cannot be used on soils with restricted drainage. The alluvial soils <br />at Seneca If have a very slow permeability due to their high clay con- <br />tent. Therefore, no adequate quality irrigation water is available to <br />potentially irrigate these fine textured alluvial soils. <br />Land Use <br />The historical land use of many alluvial valley floors (AVF) in the Routt <br />and Moffat County areas has been for intensive agriculture. Hay, small <br />grains, and grazing have been the major agricultural activities on these <br />areas. In addition to the developed areas, there are many more that <br />were developed temporarily, as during the homestead era, and later <br />abandoned. Many other areas, while meeting AVF criteria in the broad- <br />est extent of the word, have never been developed and probably never <br />will be developed. <br />Grassy Creek, Little Grassy Creek, and several tributaries to Fish Creek <br />• located in the southeatern portion of the permit area are areas that meet <br />broad AVF criteria. However, these areas have never been developed for <br />intensive agriculture. The Cook Ditch was evidently an irrigation project <br />associated with Grassy Creek, but it was never developed. No evidence <br />exists for improvements or planned improvements of the above or other <br />areas. <br />Agricultural activities have been going on in the area since the 1880's <br />and much development has taken place. Over the last 100 years, all <br />areas that were physically or economically feasible have been devel- <br />oped. Areas abandoned indicate those areas that were marginal. Areas <br />not developed quite simply show that they are not suited for intensive <br />agricultural activities. <br />The areas in question are subirrigated drainages that may or may not <br />have seasonal flows. They are generally small and narrow and not con- <br />• ducive to farming operations. They do provide good grazing because of <br />the subirrigated nature and plants present. Sagebrush will not grow in <br />the wetter areas and so they tend to have a heavy grass and forb com- <br />position. Closer inspection shows that heavy grazing has been the past <br />7-7-7 Revised 5/27/81 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.