My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE45145
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE45145
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:47:32 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 12:13:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1998105
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/3/1999
Doc Name
DRAFT PRE HEARING ORDER
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~ <br /> <br />Does the reclamation permit application properly and adequately delineate wetland areas <br />on the site? <br />2. Is the revegetation plan contained in the reclamation plan appropriate and adequate? <br />May the Board incorporate other agencies' conditions into the reclamation permit? <br />4. Does the application adequately address the impacts of mining on riparian, wetland, and <br />floodplain areas on the site? <br />5. Does the application address the possible effects of the mining operation on floodplain <br />areas where flooding may be aggravated by releases of water from upstream reservoirs by <br />the Bureau of Reclamation and the National Park Service? <br />Is the topsoil replacement plan adequate? <br />Is the proposed amount of the financial warranty adequate to cover the costs of <br />reclamation? <br />Should the Applicant be required to monitor water quality as a part of site reclamation? <br />9. Does the Applicant have a legal right of entry onto those lands incorrectly platted by the <br />County Planning Department? <br />10. Does that application provide for the minimization of impacts to adjacent property? <br />TV. ISSUES NOT TO BE CONSIDERED <br />All other issues raised by the parties that aze not encompassed in the list above will not be <br />considered by the Boazd, either because the concern has been addressed or because the issue is <br />outside the jurisdiction and authority of the Boazd under the Construction Materials Act. <br />V. WITNESSES AND EXHIBITS <br />Rule 2.7.1(2) requires that pre-hearing orders contain lists of all witnesses and exhibits that the <br />parties will introduce at the hearing. The purpose of this rule is to ensure that parties are given an <br />opportunity to prepare replies or rebuttals to the materials offered by other parties. The parties to <br />this matter did not submit any witness or exhibit lists at the Pre-hearing Conference. If any party <br />intends to introduce any exhibits or call any witnesses at the hearing, that party should deliver a <br />list of intended exhibits and witnesses to all other parties at least three days prior to the hearing on <br />Apri128 and 29, 1999. <br />All documents, exhibits and photographs presented as evidence at the Formal Public Hearing will <br />become part of the administrative record. Upon request, a party may recover any evidence <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.