Laserfiche WebLink
6. <br />and final drawdown for each step was 5, 9.4 and 38 gpm and 0.04, <br />0.07 and 0.46 feet, respectively. Test drrata are presented in <br />Appendix A. ~~~ 1T ~I'lS~4s ;ri.,r5¢,ylr`~ ~ lox <br />Monitor well W-16 ocated 40 feet from the pumped well (W-15) 'T " <br />showed no drawdown during the test. Field analysis of the step <br />w G drawdown test data indicated that the pump supplied was not <br />~~,capable of discharging enough water to significantly stress the <br />S "Jc~QSPs alluvial aquifer. After discussions with CRCC and the CMLRD, it <br />p was determined that the step drawdown test was sufficient to <br />~""~`P~{ enable the estimation of the aquifer transmissivity within an <br />~vo~/i- order of magnitude. Interpretation of the step test and a <br />~c~c~~~~ listing of the test data is presented in section 4.1 and <br />S (~ Appendix A, respectively. <br />~~ 3.3 CONSTA~FT. DISCHARGE TEST AT WELL W-9 <br />M~LR1 d~lv~3l~1f~ <br />Two wells, pumped well W-9 and observation well W-10, are <br />~'~" ~ located along the Barren Ridge and are completed into the coal <br />~~ '` bearing Fruitland Formation. These wells were used to evaluate <br />s~„rs W ~ bedrock aquifer characteristics. A submersible pump capable of <br />psfs producing 10 gpm was placed in well W-9 on September 7, 1982. <br />5 ~~ <br />~~~Ygas A step drawdown test was not necessary because previous pump <br />r~~ -S test data was available, and indicated that the well would pro- <br />t^' ~ F <br />b a ~~ ~ duce 4 gpm for a period exceeding 24 hours. . <br />r <br />A 24 hour constant drawdown and recovery test was initiated at <br />0745 hours on September 8, 1982. A discharge of approximately <br />4 gpm was maintained throughout the test. Interpretation of the <br />test, test data summary, and evaluation'of the pumping data are - <br />presented in section 4.2, Appendix B, and Appendix C, respec- <br />tively. <br />