My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE44671
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE44671
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:47:07 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 12:01:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982055A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
page 454 - 539
Section_Exhibit Name
SECTION 2.05 OPERATION PLAN PART 2
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0.. <br />' C©f~L tCEFUSE - P+~yStCRt_ + Cg~CN~MIc~1~ T~srs <br />• DISCUSSION OF FIELD SAMPLING PROCEDURES <br />Greg Lew.icki, mining engineer for D. H. Emling Company, was the sole <br />person involved in taking samples. <br />To assure representative samples, the following steps were taken: <br />(1) During initial prep plant operation, many adjustments were <br />made to produce clean coal and refuse of the proper quality <br />and quantity. Most of this work was done during December <br />1982. Refuse samples were taken on January 17-20, 1983, after <br />all adjustments were made. <br />(2) Samples were taken from the coal refuse belt immediately after <br />the belt left the prep plant.. A shovel was used to grab samples <br />from the belt at 1/2 hour intervals over a period of three days <br />on the daylight shift. No samples were taken from the temporary <br />refuse stockpile. <br />• (3) Immediately after collection, all samples were placed in plastic <br />drums and sealed to preserve the moisture content of the refuse <br />as it was produced. <br />(4) A total of 75 pounds of sample refuse was sent to the laboratory <br />for analysis. <br />It should be noted that rotary brezker reject material was not included in <br />the physical analysis because of its larger size. Although it is ^ecognized that <br />this material could have significantly different physical properties, it only <br />comprises 2 to 30 of the total refuse produced, and is got expected to alter the <br />stability of the embar.Y,ment. This aspect ~.vil' be discussed in morn detail in the <br />r_quest for revision. <br />~• <br />473 <br />i D. F!. EV.~.ING CC!v1?ANY <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.