My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE44640
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE44640
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:47:06 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 12:00:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/12/2003
Doc Name
Section 9 & Section 10 (report April 7, 2003)
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume VII Geotechnical Studies
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M99238GE <br />• On site proposed embankment fill material: <br />inconsolidated undrained: <br />. an internal angle of friction of fifteen (15) degrees, <br />. a cohesion of one-thousand two-hundred seventy-five (1,275) <br />pounds per square foot, and <br />. a moist unit weight of one-hundred twenty-eight (128) pounds <br />per cubic foot, <br />Unconsolidated drained: <br />. an internal angle of friction of twenty-two (22) degrees, <br />. a cohesion of one-thousand (1,000) pounds per square foot, <br />and <br />. a moist unit weight of one-hundred forty-five (145) pounds <br />per cubic foot. <br />In our stability analysis we varied the soil strength values from <br />those listed above to assess the sensitivity of the analysis to <br />varying soil strength parameters. The variations in our analysis <br />produced relatively small and predictable changes to the calculated <br />theoretical factor of safety indicating that the stability analysis <br />was not sensitive to slight variances in the soil strength charac- <br />teristics. <br />• Our analysis included assuming that the pond would remain full <br />for sufficient time to fully saturate the embankment materials and <br />the pond slopes and then be rapidly emptied to generate a rapid <br />draw down condition within the embankment slopes. We recognize <br />that the anticipated use of the pond will not likely result in this <br />condition, however, it is a possibility that a rapid draw down <br />condition may occur. <br />The results of our stability analysis for the critical failure <br />plane which generated the lowest factor of safety are presented on <br />Figures 3 through 7. <br />4.1 Foundation Preparation <br />The foundation area of the embankment should be cleared of all <br />vegetable, organic or deleterious material prior to placement of <br />the embankment fill. The clearing operations should extend beyond <br />each edge of the proposed embankment a distance sufficient to <br />insure that the embankment fill is not placed on any deleterious <br />material or at least five (S) feet; whichever is greater. This <br />concept is shown on Figure 8. The soil exposed in the clearing <br />6 <br /> <br />lambert ana associates <br />COnSULiiRG GEOTEC~eiCK ENGiN EERS •RO <br />~ MATE RILL TESTING <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.