My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE44640
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE44640
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:47:06 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 12:00:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/12/2003
Doc Name
Section 9 & Section 10 (report April 7, 2003)
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume VII Geotechnical Studies
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M952s8GE <br />• slice are evaluated from the equilibrium of the slices; that is, <br />the forces that tend to drive the slice downhill and the forces <br />that tend tc resist the movement of the slice. The equilibrium of <br />the entire mass is determined by summing the driving and summing <br />the resisting forces acting on all slices and comparing these <br />forces. <br />Our slope stability analysis was performed using "Slope Stability <br />Analysis" by Geosoft computer software. Our slope stability <br />analysis considered a total of about 1,000 separate possible <br />failure surface iterations to help identify the potential theoreti- <br />cal slope stability. Our discussions and data presentation is <br />based only on the calculated critical circle which presented the <br />lowest factor of safety against failure. Our presentation does not <br />include the results of all of the iterations which resulted in a <br />theoretical factor of safety greater than the lowest factor of <br />safety and therefore were not critical. <br />Our analysis was based on soil strength characteristics obtained <br />from laboratory triaxial shear strength tests of samples of soil <br />material encountered in our test borings obtained during our field <br />study. Based on information provided by and as requested by Mr. <br />Jim Stover the proposed embankment material tests were based on <br />samples remolded to at least ninety (90) percent of the maximum dry <br />density as defined by ASTM D698, standard moisture content-dry <br />density relationship (Proctor) test. The soil strength values used <br />in our analysis included: <br />Site soil material: <br />Unconsolidated undrained: <br />an internal angle of friction of eleven (11) degrees, <br />cohesion of three-hundred sixty (360) pounds per square foot <br />and <br />a moist unit weight of one-hundred sixteen (116) pounds <br />per cubic foot, <br />Unconsolidated drained: <br />an internal angle of friction of fourteen (14) degrees, <br />cohesion of three hundred (300) pounds per square foot and <br />a moist unit weight of one-hundred sixteen (116) pounds per <br />cubic foot, <br />5 <br /> <br />~Lamberr ana ~ssoriate,~ <br />CONSUL TiMG GEOiECrv rviC~L EMGirv EE RS •rv0 <br />M •iE RILL TESiIMG <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.