My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE44640
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE44640
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:47:06 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 12:00:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/12/2003
Doc Name
Section 9 & Section 10 (report April 7, 2003)
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume VII Geotechnical Studies
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M03086GE <br />have strength characteristics less than the values used in our <br />analysis for the proposed fill materials the results of our stabil- <br />ity analysis may be significantly influenced. <br />Our analysis was based on soil strength characteristics obtained <br />from laboratory direct shear strength tests of samples tested for <br />our geotechnical engineering study for the proposed conveyor. The <br />soil strength values used in our analysis included: <br />Proposed soil material: <br />an internal angle of friction of thirty (30) degrees, <br />cohesion of three-hundred seventy-five (375) pounds per <br />square foot and <br />a moist unit weight of one-hundred thirty-five (135) pounds <br />per cubic foot. <br />I <br />fly <br />Our analyses assumed that the embankment fill will be well <br />drained and pore pressures will not develop in the fill. <br />In our stability analyses we varied the soil strength values from <br />those listed above to assess the sensitivity of the analysis to <br />varying soil strength parameters. The variations in our analysis <br />produced relatively predictable changes to the calculated theoret- <br />ical factor of safety indicating that the stability analysis was <br />somewhat sensitive to variances in the soil strength characteris- <br />tics. <br />Our stability analysis of the cross section indicated a theoreCi- <br />cal calculated factor of safety of: <br />- about 1.26 for section A-A, <br />- about 1.56 for section A-A, <br />- about 1.92 for section B-B, <br />- about 1.84 for section C-C, <br />portal bench excavation cut slope, <br />portal bench fill slope, <br />upper stockpile area.fill slope and <br />lower stockpile area fill slope. <br />The analyses assumed a well drained condition in all cases. The <br />results of our slope stability analyses are presented on Figures 2 <br />Through 5. <br />All areas to receive fill should be stripped of all vegetation, <br />organic soils and other deleterious material prior to fill place- <br />ment. Areas to receive fill should be constructed with a toe key <br />and benched into competent foundation material.. The key and bench <br />concept is shown on Figure 6. We should observe the key and bench <br />preparation to verify that the key and bench extends into competent <br />material. We suggest that construction of the portal bench fill <br />5 <br />Lambert anb ~,oooeiateo <br />GONSULTNG GEOTEONNIOwL ENOINEE RS we0 <br />MATE RIwL TESTING <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.