My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE43804
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE43804
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:46:17 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 11:42:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
m2004044
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/22/2004
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Tetra Tech RMC
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
168
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TETRA TECH RMC Mc Larry Oehler <br />Adequacy Response M-2004-044 <br />November 22, 2004 <br />Page 8 of 20 <br />writing, from UDFCD, prior to consideration of the application, for the planned <br />100 feet setback. <br />A Floodplain Use Application has been submitted to Adams County for this <br />project. Adams County is the regulating authority on the flood permit; however <br />Adams County will request review and comment from Urban Drainage and Flood <br />Control District (UD&FCD). The Mining Plan Map Sheet 5 of 7 has denoted the <br />"limit of mining without further approval of the UD&FCD". <br />14. For reaches of the South Platte River north of the Morgan Smith Natural Area <br />the UDFCD requests that Aggregate Industries change the Application to <br />include the information that "Mining limit without further approval of UDFCD <br />and DMG be shown at a 300 feet setback from the riverbank." Please make the <br />necessary changes to the application narrative and plan maps or obtain <br />approval in writing, prior to consideration of the application, from UDFCD for <br />the planned 100 feet setback. (See UDFCD's letter of 8-6-04 referenced above) <br />The Mining Plan Map Sheet 5 of 7 has denoted the "limit of mining without <br />further approval of the UD&FCD". <br />Exhibit E -Reclamation Plan <br />1. Describe the extraction of sand and gravel in relation to establishment of the <br />reservoir bank slopes. Will the dry mined pits be excavated to 3h:lv slopes or <br />will they be excavated to steeper slopes and then backfilled to reclamation <br />grades? If excavation of the reservoir perimeter will be to slopes steeper than <br />the reclamation grade describe backfilling of the pit perimeters including the <br />level of compaction and the timing of backftlling in relation to the completion <br />of sand and gravel extraction. <br />The detail, Section A-A on the Mining Plan Maps (sheet 4 and 5), shows that the <br />mining operation will temporarily excavate vertical high walls and backfill 3:1 <br />sideslopes for reclamation of the water storage reservoir. The Slope Stability <br />Analysis conservatively modeled the mining excavation assuming a vertical high- <br />wall. <br />The site will be concurrently reclaimed to create the water storage reservoirs. <br />Compaction for the reservoir sideslopes at this site will be 95% (or better) <br />standard proctor. When an area is completely mined out from grade to bedrock, <br />each section approximately 800 foot wide (or approximately 30 acres), will begin <br />sideslope construction while the next contiguous area or consecutive phase is <br />beginning mining. Due to the floodway, there is limited space for stockpile <br />placement at this site; by concurrently reclaiming, as an area is being prepared for <br />mining, the overburden and topsoil can be stripped and immediately placed, or <br />H:\3919_0l9_OI VviLRR\DMG Response\Ist Adequacy Response to DMG I 1-5-04.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.