Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Larry Oehler <br />TETRA TECH RMC Adequacy Response M-2004-044 <br />November 22, 2004 <br />Page 3 of 20 <br />bridges between Phase 3 and the West Fill Area. Also, use that map symbol <br />between areas that will not be affected but are in areas that otherwise are to be <br />affected, such as, the portion of the Kerr McGee Oil Well Tank and Separator <br />and associated road. See the definition of "Affected Land" Rule 1 Section <br />1.1(3). For 112 permits, an Affected Land Boundary must be used to show the <br />boundary between land within the Permit Boundary that will be affected and <br />land that will not be affected Another example of where the Affected Land <br />Boundary line should be used is between the West Fill Area and the Brighton <br />and Brantner Ditches and between the Phase 3 area (including the slurry wall) <br />and the unaffected corridor for the Brighton Ditch and the power line. <br />Please refer to the response provided in item (3) above. <br />S. On sheet 5 of 7 (Mining Map), a solid line is shown extending east -west across <br />the narrowest portion of Phase 1. This is an unnecessary line and makes the <br />map a little confusing. Eliminate the line or explain why it should remain. <br />This line is the parcel line referenced to the legal descriptions on the Existing <br />Conditions Map. The line has been removed from the Mining Plan Map (Sheet 5 <br />of 7). <br />Exhibit D -Mining Plan <br />1. Commit to providing any necessary revisions to the mining plan, in the event <br />that the County Floodplain Use permit Process requires a different setback <br />distance from the top of the South Platte River Bank or different protection <br />measures on the inside reservoir bank. <br />If the Adams County Floodplain Use permit process requires changes to the <br />Mining Plan Maps that impact the DMG permit, the applicant will submit a <br />technical revision to the DMG. <br />2. Provide plans for Division review, which will ensure adequate erosion and <br />sediment control measures for protection of the Brantner and Brighton Ditches <br />and the quantity and quality of water in the ditches. The plan should include <br />construction plans /designs for al[ facilities such as diversions and sediment <br />basins or other facilities that will be used to prevent flood and sediment damage <br />to the ditches. The plans should consider the maximum possible 10 year 24 <br />hour storm event. The earliest possible establishment of vegetative cover would <br />be a good practice for control of erosion and sedimentation a~:d should be <br />included in your plans. Your plan for filling the West Fill Area appears to <br />include creating piles 30 feet high with 1 h: l v slopes. Such lo~ag steep slopes <br />would cause rapid runoff and be very erosive. Less steep slopes such as 3h:1 v <br />would be much easier to establish a protective vegetative cover on. The Division <br />H:\3919_019_OIUILRB\DMG Response\lst Adequacy Response to DMG I I-5-04.doc <br />