Laserfiche WebLink
• analysis is limited to hydrology parameters; thus CP Factors have no direct influence on analysis results, and <br />have not been presented in this analysis. <br />2.9 Other Parameters <br />Principal spillway parameters were taken from permit documents and Feld observations. The water level in <br />the pond was assumed, at the time of a storm, to be at the level of the principal spillway intake. <br />3. SEDCAD+ ANALYSIS INFORMATION <br />Enclosure 1 is a SEDCAD+ demonstration fora 10-year, 24-hour storm event. Enclosure 2 is a SEDCAD+ <br />demonstration for a 25-year, 24-hour storm event. <br />The runoff volume from a 10-year, 24-hour storm event is 4.14 acre-feet (Enclosure 1, Subwatershed/Structure <br />inpuUOutput Table). As demonstrated in the Elevation-Area-Capacity-Discharge Table (Enclosure 1), the <br />peak stage elevation for this runoff would be 8199.2 (below the crest of the emergency spillway). The runoff <br />would be discharged through the principal spillway. There would be no flow over the emergenry spillway <br />(Figure Q-3, 1129P94, attached). <br />The runoff volume from a 25-year, 24-hour storm event would be 6.41 acre-feet (Enclosure 2, <br />Subwatershed/Structure Input/Output Table). As demonstrated in the Elevation-Area-Capacity-Discharge <br />Table (Enclosure 2), the peak stage elevation (level of the pond) would be 8200.23 with a peak stage discharge <br />of 15.41 cubic feet per second (cfs). To obtain a close approximation of the distribution of this discharge <br />between the principal and emergency spillways, the performance of the pond was analyzed between elevations <br />• 8196 and 8202 at 0.2-foot intervals (Enclosure 3). This more precise definition demonstrates that the total <br />discharge, at the peak stage elevation of 8200.23 would be 15.55 (Elevation-Area-Capacity-Discharge Table, <br />Enclosure 3). Straight-line proration of discharges through the principal spillway, and over the emergenry <br />spillway, are developed in the following table. <br />Spillway Discharges <br />Stage Elevation Principal Spillway Emergency Spillway Total <br />8200.20 9.3' S.4' 14.7' <br />8200.23 9.42= 6.21= 15.63= <br />8200.30 10.1' 10.8' 20.9' <br />' Elevation-Discharge Table, Enclosure 3 <br />2 Calculated, straight-line proration <br />The straight-line approximation raises the total peak stage discharge to 15.63 from 15.55. The wnservative <br />maximum value of 6.21 cfs over the emergency spillway is used to review the requirement for riprap. <br />Enclosure 4, SEDCAD+ Erodible Channel Design, demonstrates that riprap in the emergency spillway is not <br />required. The maximum allowable velocity over the colloidal alluvial silt substrate is 5.00 feet per second (fps). <br />Anticipated velocities are not expected to exceed 2.35 fps (Enclosure 4). Incidental to the riprap review, the <br />spillway analysis also demonstrates that the as-built emergenry spillway meets depth criteria (the distance from <br />the maximum water surface elevation to the top of the emergenry spillway is 1.77 fee[, greater than the <br />required 1 foot). <br />(Canadian Strip Mine, Pond 1 Riprap Review, 27 Dec 94, Page 4 of 5) <br />