Laserfiche WebLink
• TECHNICAL REVISION N0. 14 <br />With this change the following two Addendums are contained in Tab 10: <br />ADDENDUM 10-1 <br />ADDENDUM 10-2 <br />The appropriate administrative changes have been made to Tab 10. <br />2. Page 5 of the baseline survey was obviously modified by Peabody, as <br />indicated by the change in type. Please specify what was modified <br />on this page. <br />Response: <br />The final baseline vegetation report reflects a joint effort by Peabody <br />and ESCO Associates to make it as correct and accurate as possible. <br />During final review by Peabody, several last minute corrections were <br />required. Page 5 originally contained a reference to the "Cypress <br />Area", as well as a typo. These were discovered late in the assembly of <br />Technical Revision No. 14, requiring that the corrections, be made at <br />Peabody's office instead of returning it to the consultants' office for <br />correction using similar type format. The entire page was retyped by <br />Peabody to standardize the appearance of the page. <br />• Tab 12 - Operation Plan <br />1. Page 12-9, dated August 27, 1986, specifies a permit area of 3,375 <br />acres. Revised page 12-9, dated May 16, 1988, specifies a permit <br />area of 3,444 acres; an increase in permit area of 69 acres. <br />Please address the additional 61.6 acres considering this <br />application is only requesting the addition of 7.4 acres. <br />Response: <br />Technical Revision No. 12 added 61.6 acres to the 3,375 acres which were <br />permitted as of August 27, 1986. Technical Revision No. 14 adds an <br />additional 7.4 acres to the permit area for a total of 3,444 acres. <br />2. The current permit issued to Peabody in 1987 is for a 5-year term <br />with expiration scheduled in 1992 (with the right to successive <br />renewal). As such, the permit document should address these 5 <br />years with actual rather than projected values being used for the <br />elapsed years. Please resubmit Tables 12-2, 12-3, 12-4, 12-5, and <br />12-6 with actual 1987 values rather than the deletion of this year <br />as currently proposed by this application. <br />Response: <br />See new Tables 12-2A, 12-3A, 12-4A, 12-5A and 12-6A. The estimated <br />• operating statistics cannot be listed with the actual operating <br />statistics because of the changes in mining conditions, market <br />conditions, etc. and the totals will not add to equivalent values; <br />therefore, the actual operating statistics are supplied in separate <br />tables. <br />5 <br />