My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE42765
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE42765
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:45:12 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 11:18:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1987049
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/4/1987
Doc Name
FN M-87-049 ADEQUACY ITEMS
From
MLRD
To
GARY TUTTLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />11, As discussed on-site, we recommend that the mature cottonwoods along <br />the South Platte River should be protected. They provide excellent- <br />wildlife habitat and berm stabilization. Please use the aerial <br />photo/map to delineate the anticipated pit boundaries relative to <br />the existing trees. The boundaries should be designed to avoid as <br />many of the trees as possible. <br />72, The proposed gas pipeline berms and the proposed method of <br />excavating in and near the pipelines may not be adequate to protect <br />the lines from damage. Sma11 berms adjacent to relatively large <br />lakes can be easily eroded by wave action. We will recommend <br />approval of the proposed configuration only if we receive a copy of <br />a specific agreement between Coors and the operator. Alternative <br />plans may be necessary of such an agreement is not obtained. <br />13. As with all river pits, we need to be assured that the proposed pit <br />will not create hazards to off-site structures or adjacent <br />properties during flood conditions, We will coordinate our <br />requirements with those of the Urban Drainage and Flood Control <br />District (UDFCD) so that the operator is not penalized by double <br />regulation. Mr, Ben Urbonas (UDFCD) is reviewing your proposal and <br />we expect his comments shortly. It is our hope that we can <br />incorporate specific berm stabilization requirements for the final <br />approval; however, if this is not possible, then we will recommend a <br />general stipulation regarding compliance with UDFCD requirements. <br />In the absence of specific design plans, we will also recommend that <br />the operator maintain a 400 foot undisturbed setback. This would <br />allow initial application approval and the operator could revise the <br />plan as more detailed designs are available. <br />Exhibit E - Reclamation Plan <br />1. As previously mentioned, we recommend that the operator redistribute <br />topsoil to a minimum depth of 10 to 12 inches. The soil should be <br />readily available and such depths should enhance revegetation <br />success, and thus accelerate financial warranty release. Also, the <br />end use at the plant area is agriculture, so deeper topsoil <br />redistribution is appropriate. A range of 12-16" should be <br />considered. Please provide specific redistribution depths. <br />The pit areas will be used as wildlife habitat. We will be <br />discussing specific recommendations with the Division of Wildlife, <br />so that final reclamation provides an optimal wildlife habitat <br />configuration. Such suggestions may include expansion of shallow or <br />shelf area, greater shoreline irregularity, etc., we will forward <br />any new recommendations as soon as they become available. <br />3. Please provide more specific details regarding tree and shrub <br />establishment. Include planting densities and anticipated survial <br />rates. Also, please consider attempting to reestablish cottonwoods <br />to compensate for those lost to mining. Perhaps some smaller trees <br />can be transplanted from other areas of the property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.