My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1999-05-28_PERMIT FILE - M1999002
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M1999002
>
1999-05-28_PERMIT FILE - M1999002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2021 8:53:26 AM
Creation date
11/20/2007 11:16:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999002
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/28/1999
Doc Name
Process Solution Analysis
From
DMG
To
American Soda LLC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br /> DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY DRAFT <br /> Department of Natural Resources <br /> 1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br /> Denver,Colorado 80203 D I V I S 1 0 N O F <br /> Phone:(303)866-3567 MINERALS <br /> FAX:(303)832-8106 & <br /> GEOLOGY <br /> RECLAMATION <br /> MINING-SAFETY <br /> Date: May 28, 1999 <br /> Bill Owens <br /> Governor <br /> To: Allen Sorenson Greg E.Watcher <br /> Executive Director <br /> Michael B.Long <br /> From: Harry H. Posey Division Director <br /> Subject: Review: Public Comments Submitted by General Chemical Corporation, May I2, <br /> 1999, regarding Yankee Gulch Sodium Minerals Project, American Soda, L.L.P, <br /> M-99-002 <br /> GENERAL REVIEW COMMENT <br /> General Chemical has prepared what sounds like a concise and well-supported objection which <br /> states, in part, that nahcolite recovery may damage the oil shale resource. Citing portions of a <br /> letter from the BLM, General Chemical maintains that if nahcolite is to be recovered using water <br /> temperatures in excess of 350 degrees fahrenheit, then the mineral dawsonite [NaAI(OH)2CO31 <br /> will dissolve and release CO2, and the oil shale resource will be damaged. <br /> Mr. Bill Hill, BLM-Meeker, was contacted for more information on this question. BLM is <br /> preparing a response which will be delivered with the final review. Meanwhile, it seems that <br /> General Chemical may have misinterpreted the BLM letter cited in their objection. According to <br /> Hill, dawsonite will not dissolve in water even up to temperatures of 425'F, which is the <br /> maximum proposed potential temperature that we have heard in discussions of this project. <br /> Dawsonite can be slaked or retorted, but not below temperatures of about 900' F. Oil shale, on <br /> the other hand, apparently cannot be retorted below temperatures of about 600'F. <br /> There is some uncertainty in the above-cited temperature values. At a minimum, mineral <br /> solubilities and oil shale cracking or retorting temperatures will vary with solution chemistry. <br /> The presence of gases such as CO2 also should affect retorting temperatures. The degree of <br /> uncertainty, however, is not known. <br /> To test whether oil shale destruction will take place at the proposed process solution <br /> temperatures, the BLM and DMG—in consultation with USGS, the County, EPA and the <br /> operator—constructed a set of monitoring requirements which includes, among other parameters, <br /> benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC). <br /> Baseline studies for DMG are to include reports on the composition of the process solutions, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.