PERMFILE42009

• Permit No: M2006060
• IBM Index Class Name: Permit File
• Doc Date: 10/24/2006
• Doc Name: Adequacy Review Letter and Fax Tx Report
• From: DRMS
• To: JCRB
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

Mr. Nelson Selcer
Adequacy Review, Permit Application No. M-2006-060
October 24, 2006
Rule 6.4.5 Exhibit E -Reclamation Plan
6. In the Reclamation Plan, the applicant indicates that topsoil will be replaced ".,.to a depth of at least 4" to 6" in
preparation of a uniform seed bed: ' Based on soil infortnation provide in the permit application, the soil overlying the
gravel resource varies from six inches to 3 feet. Therefore, in order to provide the greatest probability of success in
plant establishment, the Division requests that the applicant commit to replacing at least eighteen (IS) inches of
topsoil subsoil over reclaimed areas.
Rule 6.4.7 Exhibit G -Water Information
7. In accordance with Rule 6.4.7{3), please provide an estimate of the project water requirements including flow rates
and annual volumes for the development, mining and reclamation phases of the project.
8. In accordance with Rule 6.4.7(4}, please indicate the sources of any water to be used in the mining and reclamation
phases of the operation, and projected amount from each source.
9. In accordance with Rule 6.4.7(5), affirmatively state whether or not the operator has acquired or applied for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the Water Quality Control Division at the Colorado
Department of Health.
Rule 6.4.19 Exhibit S -Permanent Man-made Structures
10. Itt accordance with Rule 6.4.19(c), letters from utility companies documenting "no negative effect" on their utility
from mining, must be notarized. Therefore, please have the letter from WAPA notarized and resubmit it to the
Division. In addition, since JCR is a permanent man-made structure, please obtain and submit a notarized agreement
from Jackson County that meets the criteria set forth in Rule 6.4.19.
Please be advised that the permit application for the BLM West Gravel Pit may be deemed inadequate and the permit
application denied on October 30, 2006 unless the above-mentioned adequacy review items are addressed to the
satisfaction of the Division. If you feel more time is needed to complete your reply, the Division can grant an extension to
the decision date. This will be done upon receipt of a written waiver of your right to a decision by October 30, 2006 and
request for additional time. This must be received no later than the deadline date.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call, I can be reached at [phone].
Sincerely,
/~~ - -..'
~, ~ ~Z. ~ ~-.----
Richard M. Wenzel III
Environmental Protection Specialist
cc: Carl Mount; DMG (via a-mail}