Laserfiche WebLink
108 • Fourth International Symposium~Salt-Northern Ohio Geological Satiety <br />the location of the weak bedding planes could be ascer- <br />tained. Three weak bedding planes located at the depths <br />of 2l0 feet, 1000 feet, and 1800 feet were assumed. The <br />locations of these weak planes are shown in Figure 6. <br />Geometry ojcavity. Because neither the vertical extent <br />o(the salt producing interval nor the horizontal extent of <br />solution mining operations was known, the exact location <br />and geometry of the cavity cannot be determined. From <br />a rough estimate of total production to the date (August, <br />1959) when the field measurements were available (5-1/2 <br />million tons), it was estimated that a thickness of IS to IS <br />feet of salt within the area of producing wells was re- <br />moved. The area of producing wells teas approximately <br />2000 feet by 4000 fee[. A number o(cases were analyzed <br />for the assumed idealized rock profile with a cavity 20 feet <br />thick and 1000 feet, 2000 feet, and 3000 feet in radius. <br />These cases are summarized in Table 1. <br />Obser)rd subsidcrtce profile. The field measurements <br />obtained indicate [hat subsidence of a magnitude of 2-1/2 <br />[EPTN BElor , <br />a1RF4(Z <br />(FT) <br />6 ~W <br />_~ Es- tos rsl J - 0.7 <br />a~ <br />zto _G C o <br />0 <br />rg- z,to` n, J. 0.7 <br />s <br />)ooo ~ c ~ o - <br />3 <br />o +I <br />~ E~ - y)o° nl J. o.) <br />>_ <br />tsso <br />tech c : o <br />TABLE I <br />Analysis-Case I <br />Height of Radius of Slip y <br />Cavity Ift.l Cavity Ift.) Layers Ko pcf <br />20 1000 Slayers 1.0 144 <br />20 2000 Slayers 1.0 144 <br />20 2000 None 1,0 144 <br />20 3000 Slayers 7.0 144 <br />feet, and horizontal compression of the ground surface in <br />the immediate plant area of as much as 4 inches per I00 <br />feet, had occurred in a period between 1939 and 1958. I[ <br />teas observed that the subsidence a-as localized within the <br />mined area. Away from the center of the mined area, the <br />magnitude of subsidence decreased gradually. <br />In addition to subsidence observed in the field, caving <br />in some of the wells was noted. The height of caving above <br />the sal[ too(ranged from 40 [0 122 feet indicating that the <br />shale bed separating the ttvo sal[ beds has caved in. <br />Co)nporlson ojcomputed and observed subsidence pro- <br />files. The results from the analytical studies conducted for <br />Case I are presented in Figure 7 and Table ]I. An average <br />subsidence profile measured in the field is also plotted in <br />Fieure 7 for comparison. For the cases in which three <br />weak planes were assumed, the subsidence at the center of <br />the cavity increases rapidly with increasing radii of the <br />cavity. The subsidence calculated is 0.62, 4.77, and 16.9 <br />feet for the cases with the radius of the cavity equal to <br />4000, 2000, and 3000 feet, respectively. For the case with <br />the radius of the cavity equal to 2000 feet and assuming <br />no weak bedding plane in the rock mass, the subsidence <br />was computed to be 1.62 feet. The maximum subsidence <br />observed in the field was 2.7 feet. It is very interesting to <br />note by examining the observed and calculated subsidence <br />profiles presented in Figure7thatthe observed subsidence <br />could have been predicted if the radius of the cavity were <br />assumed to be about 1500 feet which is about the size of <br />the cavity expected in the field and three slip layers were <br />assumed to exist. (The mined area is approximately 2000 <br />feet by 4000 feet.) The calculated results also indicate [hat <br />the subsidence profiles computed by assuming the exis- <br />tence of weak bedding planes are quite similar in shape to <br />that observed in the field. <br />~ I Eg • 3stos .sl J . o.) <br />1 <br />~ DISC S`•nPED p"EH lrlt <br />nro a~~-~ zo n <br />Figure 6. Idealized rock pr of,le, Case I. <br />Case II <br />Geological conditions. The rock formation at the site is <br />primarily shale with scattered thin layers of sandstone <br />found at the depth of 110 to 1140 feet below the surface. <br />The upper 1000-foot-thick layer is dark gray, green, and <br />brown, laminated shales o(the Bridget Formation. Below <br />the Bridget Formation is 240-fool-[hick, grayish-brown <br />sandy Laney Shale, member of the Green River Forma- <br />tion.Immediately below the zone are predominantly light <br />grayish green shale of the Nilkins Peak Member of the <br />Green River Formation ui[h a thickness o(480 feet. Be- <br />