Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Analysis Methodology <br />The calculations were performed using YSTABL O Version 5. This is an interactive slope <br />stability analysis program designed to use either the Bishop or Janbu methods for calculating <br />safety factors. The Bishop method was selected as being the most accurate application for this <br />particulaz problem. The soil properties information was input along with slope geometry, <br />loading information, water table information and definitions of limits for calculations. A total of <br />200 failure surfaces were generated for each of the three problems and the lowest safety factor <br />selected. A minimum safety factor of 1.5 is assumed to be adequate to protect either of the <br />structures. A slope failure had to actually pass through the structure to be deemed as a failure. If <br />lesser slope failures such as minor sloughing at the face of the mining highwall occurred but did <br />not touch the structure, they were judged to be insignificant. <br />Analvsis Results <br />The slope stability analysis resulted in factors of safety that were above the minimum of 1.5. In <br />all cases, the lowest safety factor did not intercept structure structures. <br />The minimum safety factor for the PSCo towers would result in a slope failure that would not <br />touch the footings for the towers. Other slope failures that intercepted the towers had safety <br />factors well above Z.0, which indicates the proposed 50 foot setback is adequate to protect the <br />stability of the powerlines. <br />The failure slope for the pit slopes adjacent to the Fulton Ditch also indicated that the minimum <br />safety factor (1.67) would not intercept the actual ditch, but would intercept the toe ofthe ditch <br />bank. Other slope failures that intercepted the ditch has lazger safety factors and indicated that <br />the proposed 50 foot setback is adequate to protect the stability of the ditch <br />The failure slope for the perimeter of the pit adjacent to public right-of--ways would not intercept <br />structures outside the property line based on the assumptions used. The minimum setback along <br />this perimeter would be 35 feet total with the %z:l highwall slopes being used. Vertical highwalls <br />would be allowable with a ,;neater setback. <br />Conclusiaus and Recommendations <br />The following conclusions and recommendations aze offered from this analysis. <br />The proposed mining operation can safely remove material with a setback of no less than <br />50 feet from the outside top bank of the Fulton Ditch. <br />2. The proposed mining operation can safely remove material with a setback of no less than <br />50 feet from the outside base of the powerline towers located in the PSCo easement that <br />passes through the Cooley property. Each tower maybe mined leaving an island <br />approximately 100 feet square. The mining can be done at a''/Z H: 1 V slope. The mined <br />azea in the easement will then be backfilled to no less than historic ground elevation with <br />overburden, clay material oc shale bedrock. All backfill would be replaced with a <br />compaction standazd of at least 90% to prevent excessive settling. <br />Page 3 <br />