My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE40577
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE40577
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:43:29 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 10:23:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2006024
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/4/2006
Doc Name
Preliminary Adequacy Review
From
DMG ajw
To
Carrizo Stone LLC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6.3.2 EXHIBIT B -Site Description <br />The proposed pre-mining and post-mining land use that was indicated on page four of the <br />application is pastureland. Amore accurate land use would probably be rangeland. Both <br />uses incorporate grazing in their respective management plan. However, pastureland <br />typically implies a higher degree of management including seeding with improved forage <br />varieties, fertilizing, irrigation, haying, etc. Rangeland typically implies more passive <br />management with controlled grazing being the primary management tool. It's not really <br />a big issue, it just seems that rangeland more accurately describes the current and future <br />use and the reclamation requirements for rangeland aze a bit less stringent. <br />6.3.3 EXHIBIT C -Mining Plan <br />You have indicated there will be no waste rock disposal, however, from my recent <br />inspection of the north quarry site, it does appear there is a considerable amount of waste <br />rock or non-mazketable rock generated. I assume that would also be the case for the <br />south quarry. Please identify on the mine plan map where this material will be stored <br />during mining. Also, how will it be disposed of once mining is completed (ie: used as <br />backfill by placing against the highwall prior to topsoiling, selling as a secondary <br />product, etc.)? <br />6.3.4 EXHIBIT D -Reclamation Plan <br />Per the comments under Exhibit C about the potential to generate waste rock, please <br />clarify how this material will be used during reclamation. Also, weed control methods <br />are required to be used for all noxious weeds on site. Even though no noxious weeds <br />were observed at this site, a generic plan to control all noxious weeds should be included <br />in all permit applications. If a specific noxious weed species appears in the future, the <br />plan may need to be modified to deal with that particulaz species at that time. <br />The reclamation costs aze still under review at this time. Your estimate appeazs to be well <br />prepared, however, the division is required to complete a separate bond estimate as well. <br />Once the question about the waste rock is clarified, this will be completed. <br />6.3.5 EXHIBIT E -Map <br />The maps included in the Camzo Stone South Quarry aze at a scale where it is hazd to <br />distinguish the details of the mining and reclamation plan. Please provide a mine plan <br />map and a reclamation plan map for the south quarry prepazed in accordance with Rule <br />6.2.1(2) that is of a scale to more accurately show the details of the mining and <br />reclamation plans. If the road to this site was not pre-existing or will be substantially <br />upgraded as the result of this mine, it must be included in the overall affected azea <br />(approximately'/:-1 acre). However, if the road was pre-existing it does not need to be <br />included and in either case, the road may remain after mining if it compliments the post- <br />mining land use. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.