My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE40570
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE40570
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:43:29 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 10:23:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1997015
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/20/1997
Doc Name
ELRICK PIT PERIT APPLICATION FN M-97-015 APPLICATION ADEQUACY REVIEW
From
DMG
To
AKRON READY MIX
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />In order for our office to properly evaluate the potential mining <br />impacts and accurately calculate the reclamation liability amount, <br />we must know the exact extent of the proposed disturbance area. <br />Bank mining requires more extensive reclamation planning and it is <br />also more costly due to the additional regrading, topsoiling and <br />revegetation required. <br />If bank mining is proposed, it is likely that the reclamation bond <br />will be larger than the $5,000.,00 currently proposed. An <br />alternative to delineating these areas now is that if a large <br />deposit of gravel is discovered during the creek bed mining that <br />would make it feasible to conduct bank mining, the permit and <br />associated liability bond could be revised at that time to <br />accommodate the mining and reclamation of such an area. <br />Either way the permit will need to be revised to remove the bank <br />mining language, or the maps and acreages will need to be adjusted <br />to clearly show the proposed bank mining areas. <br />EXHIBIT E- RECLAMATION PLAN <br />Under item E of this exhibit it is stated that phased reclamation <br />is not needed since bank disturbance will be minimal. For the <br />active creek channel this may be true, however, any vegetated bank <br />areas that are disturbed should be reclaimed as soon as possible to <br />prevent excessive unraveling while the rest of the area is being <br />mined out. This is particularly true in this situation since the <br />mining area is so long and as mining progresses there will be a <br />rather lengthy section of Surveyor Creek unreclaimed. Another <br />reason for conducting some phased reclamation is to contain the <br />size of the reclamation bond needed to cover the reclamation <br />liability. If no reclamation is completed prior to the end of <br />mining, the entire affected area will be bonded. However, if the <br />reclamation is completed in a phased approach, the size of the bond <br />will be commensurate with the proposed phases. In addition, if <br />reclamation is carried out shortly after mining has occurred, it <br />may be possible to release a sizeable portion of the reclamation <br />bond immediately at the completion of mining rather than waiting <br />several years for vegetation to establish. Phased reclamation is <br />discussed further in Exhibit L which addresses reclamation costs. <br />EXHIBIT F- RECLAMATION PLAN MAPS <br />No Comment. <br />EXHIBIT G- WATER INFORMATION <br />The statement that this mining operation does not directly affect <br />surface water systems seems to be incorrect given that an active <br />drainage channel, albeit one that only runs during significant <br />precipitation events, is being mined. Clearly, approval of this <br />mining permit will directly affect the surface water system, <br />however, the overall impact should be minimal especially after the <br />site is properly reclaimed. At the very least, the application <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.