My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE40335
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE40335
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:43:18 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 10:17:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981022
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/27/2003
Doc Name
Predicted D Seam Longwall Subsidence Report 2/26/03
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 2.05-E8 Part 6
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Elk Creek Mine Subsidence Page 25 February 26, 2003 <br />INDIVIDUAL LONGWALL PANEL TROUGH SUBSIDENCE PREDICTION <br />• <br />Longwall panel subsidence was predicted using the NCB (1975) <br />`Subsidence Engineers' Handbook". The NCB method was developed <br />from measuring the surface subsidence over 187 longwall panels. <br />These case histories were used to produce the four subsidence <br />prediction graphs in Appendix C. Individual panel subsidence <br />prediction probably represents the most conservative and accurate <br />part of longwall subsidence prediction. The Handbook states, <br />`Prediction of subsidence by the above method should <br />be correct to 10~ in the great majority of cases." <br />1• <br />Tables A1, A4, A7 and A10 in Appendix A present the <br />.predicted maximum subsidence effects for the individual Panels #1 <br />through #4 of-Pa:.el. Group 1. Tables A13, A16, A19, A22, A25, A28 <br />and A31 in Appendix A present the predicted maximum subsidence <br />effects for the individual Panels #5 through #11 of Panel Group <br />2. Tables A34, A37, A40, A43, A46, A99, A52 and A55 in Appendix <br />A present the predicted maximum subsidence effects for the <br />individual Panels #12 through #19 of Panel Group 3. <br />Surface subsidence contour maps were initially constructed <br />around each Elk Creek Mine longwall panel. The subsidence <br />contours selected were 0, 1-ft, 2-ft, 9-ft, 6-ft, 8-ft and 10-ft. <br />The selection was based on the local mining height. The maximum <br />local mining height is 12-ft, the maximum shearer cutting height, <br />where the thickness of the "D" Seam equals or exceeds 12-ft. The <br />maximum vertical surface is predicted not to exceed 0.9 times the <br />mining height, in this case 10.8-ft. This can be seen on the <br />panel width/depth correction graph, C1 in Appendix C. The seam <br />thickness controls the local mining height when less than 12-ft. <br />In addition, vertical surface subsidence tails off slowly to zero <br />outside the panel ribsides which requires closer contour <br />intervals when approaching the limit of subsidence. <br />'_ , e subsidehc ce ontour maps were constructed by compositing <br />the distance from each selected panel ribside location to where <br />' the trough subsidence reaches each selected subsidence contour <br />value. The single panel subsidence and strain predictions were <br />made for vertical panel cross sections in planes perpendicular to <br />' the gateroad ribsides, the set-up room ribside and the shield <br />recovery room ribside. Subsidence calculations were generally <br />made at the intersection of selected overburden contours and <br />where Bear Creek or Elk Creek crossed over panel ribsides. <br />The first step in applying the NCB subsidence prediction <br />' method is to calculate the maximum vertical subsidence (Smax). <br />This requires the local mining height, panel width in meters, <br />overburden depth in meters and whether or not the local area has <br />'• -25- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.