Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />12/26/79 Memo, p. 1, #2(a)(2) <br /> <br />"2. Table 3 - The scientific name for each species <br />should be given, not just the binomial abbreviation. <br />The cover given in this table does not agree with that <br />given in Table 33, 8 vegetation cover." <br />See response to 12/26/79 Memo, p. 1, #2(a) (1) <br />12/26/79 Memo, p. 2, #2(a)(3) <br />"3. Table 33 - Those values given for vegetative cover <br />do not agree with those values given for the specific <br />range sites in Tables 36, 37, 39 and 40. Please clarify. <br />The data for the other range sites (big sagebrush, <br />treated sagebrush, and pastureland) should have a <br />similar presentation as in Tables 36, 37 and 35c." <br />See response to 12/26/79 Memo, p. 1, #2(a)(1) <br />12/26/79 Memo, p. 2, #2(a)(4) <br />"4. Range site descriptions - The range sites should <br />also include in the physiographic description the <br />elevational range and the degree of slope. Included <br />within the description the soils-vegetation relationships <br />should be discussed. The acreage to be affected within <br />each range site description should be presented in a <br />table. <br />See pp. 779-126(a)-(d), Tables 40(b), 40(c), <br />49(d), 40(f) <br />12/26/79 Memo p. 2, #2(a)(5) <br />"5. The nomenclature for the range sites should be <br />consistent, the nomenclature varies from Table (41) to <br />Table (42) and maps 16 and 17." <br />See p. 779-129(a) <br />