Laserfiche WebLink
_ I <br />_ ~ ~ ~ <br />,- <br />8. Jeff Saunders did not agree ~iith cone.lusion in fourth paragraph <br />on page 32. This was not ci-~anced. <br />9. They do not want to perform an annual hydrologic prediction, could <br />go along with monitoring as required by regulations, but predictive <br />annual analysis they feel is beyond the scope or intent of the law. <br />Stipulation was changed to read like Rule 4.05.13 - Plonitorinq. <br />10. Concerned about predictions in f•liddle Creek t4ine on page 31 .. <br />Language ~~as changed to indicate it was only a preliminary estimate <br />that will be refined when the Division reviews the Middle Creek Mine. <br />11. On page 50 2nd paragraph concerned about discharge requirements. <br />They will comply with modified PIPDES. <br />All in all no major concerns and we ~~~ade appropriate changes as reflected <br />in the final findings document. <br />/ep <br />-- --.-~-:---- ~ T.-._-~. _. _. _. <br />