Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />14r.,Larry Iseschke -2- ~larcl~ 2, 1983 <br />Pursuant to Rule 2.07.6(2)(d)(iv), the <br />necessary approvals Rave been obtained <br />jurisdiction over the public road" (i.~ <br />operations within 100 feet of a public <br />issuance the Division will provide the <br />for the purpose of deter~ttininy whether <br />affected landowners will be protected. <br />applicant must submit proof that <br />from "the authority with <br />~. the City of Uelta),for <br />road. Further, prior to per~itit <br />opportunity for a public hearing <br />tVie interests of the public and <br />Finally, the permit application needs to be consolidated into one <br />cohesive document. The numerous revisions, addendums and replacement <br />payer and maps which have Ueen submitted since the original application <br />submittal in February of 1981 need to be incorporated, in loyical <br />sequence, into the application. <br />The proposed permit area has been siynificantly expanded on certain maps <br />in recent submittals, but not on others. All maps should clearly <br />indicate both the originally proposed and tite revised permit area <br />boundaries. The proposed acreage change should be reFlected in the <br />application form. <br />Mine plan projections are presented only titrouyh 1984 for the Ilo. 1 mine <br />and 1985 for tiie No. 2 mine. Ns a result, the requested four-year permit <br />term cannot be approved. <br />I suggest that we schedube a meeting to discuss the above issues and the <br />Uraft Findinys after you have had a chance to review our comments. <br />Sincerely, <br />~~~ ~. <br />Uan hlathews <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />U14/ep <br />Doc. No. 1211 <br /> <br />