My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR13288
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
3000
>
APPCOR13288
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:33:31 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:40:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
2/14/1995
Doc Name
FAX COVER YOAST MINE
From
DOW
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
02/14/95 <br />15:05 $OOJ 2.4811 <br />,Y~ <br />~nn~ <br />~, : <br />~~~~. ~ <br />TO: <br />FROQ[: <br />RE: <br />WILDLIFE N.W. <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DSVISION OF WSLDLIFE <br />Bill Clark <br />Jim Haskins <br />Peabody Coal/Yoast Mine <br />• <br />DATE: 1/10/95 <br />I've reviewad~the wildlife information contained in the'YOast Mine <br />plan &ubmitted to MLB by Peabody Cgal. A number of assumptions, <br />which I'm generally in agreement with, are made in regards to short <br />and/or long term impacts to wildlife. Following are some comments <br />about items I'm not entirely comfortable with. Non of my concerns <br />would qualify as fatal flaws in the collection or interpretation of <br />data that would affect the permitting process for this project. <br />TAB 23f FISH AND WILDLIFE YLaN <br />Page 3,,~paragraph 1 - There is an insinuation that direct impacts <br />will be mitigated by incremental reclamation. This is misleading <br />since reclaimed areas will not approximate original conditions in <br />either vegetative or species composition or diversity <br />Page 3, paragraph 3 - The statement that no net loss of habitat <br />will occur is also misleading. A net loss of the pre-mining habitat <br />will certainly occur. The alteration to another habitat type might <br />have long term implications to sensitive species like sharp-tailed <br />grouse. <br />Page 4, paragraph 4 - I find the statement that the loss of a lek <br />would not be a severe impact to be outrageous...W.e don't know what <br />mechanism drives lek selection but we do know that lek sites are <br />critical. This paragraph suggests that lek abandonment and <br />formation occurs on a regular basis and that the birds will simply <br />move to a new location. if existing leks occur on the best sites <br />then relocation, for any reason, to less optimal sites could be <br />expected to result in long term negative effects. Suitable habitat <br />may appear to be in abundance in the Hayden area but we still <br />haven't solved the puzzle of why it's unoccupied. The birds still <br />have the final word and we can't assume they'll just pick up., move <br />to a new area, and thrive. In the mines defense 2 will say that <br />there are instances of leks occurring adjacent to traveled roads <br />with few or no apparent negative effects. <br />f~j 002 <br />Page 5, paragraph 5 - With recent developments and concerns <br />regarding sage grouse I would elevate this specie to the same level <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.