My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR13244
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
3000
>
APPCOR13244
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:33:29 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:39:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1984062
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
5/1/1984
Doc Name
RESPONSED TO ADEQUACY REVIEW LETTER DATED MAR 1 1984 FOR ENERGY MINE 3 FILE C-84-062
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />swell factor of 26X can be verified by the applicant's and the Division's <br />experience in the Twentymile Park Basin. <br />1. The Division is, however, concerned with the volume of material in <br />the stockpile and surrounding area that will be used as the spoils <br />backfill. The applicant states that approximately 1,128,000 bank cubic <br />yards will be needed to backfill the portal pit. According to the <br />application 986,000 cubic yards are available from the temporary <br />overburden stockpiles leaving a deficit of 142,000 cubic yard a. The <br />applicant intends to scrape overburden material surrounding the pit area <br />to make up for the deficit 142,000 BCY. However, there are no <br />calculations to verify how much material is stockpiled and no explanation <br />as to why there is a deficit of material considering the swell factor. <br />Calculations verifying the amount of stockpiled materials are needed. <br />Regarding the deficit material further discussion is necessary. Why is <br />there a deficit and how was the figure determined? Will there be cuts in <br />the surrounding area to obtain the material and if so, how many acres <br />will be affected? <br />2. There is no mention of grading technique with regard to compaction <br />effort or lift height. This concern is primarily to address the problem <br />of saturation due to ground water inflow. Minimizing permeability and <br />porosity will substantially decrease the volume of water saturating the <br />backfilled pit. Please provide a discussion of the method of compaction <br />and grading techniques. <br />3. The map reference on Map No. 13, Cross-Sections is incorrect. The <br />-37- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.