Laserfiche WebLink
<br />• access to the well or current data. The known <br />data has been discussed in the permit. The <br />confusion arises out of the conflicting <br />information in the public records. <br />P.8 No.4 As previously discussed, Oakridge has proposed <br />a modified and expanded monitoring program. <br />P.8 No.5 A spoils monitoring program has been included <br />in the permit application. See text <br />modifications. <br />P.8 No.6 Well 17B was cased to 20 feet with 6" pvc <br />casing. It has never been known to flow. The <br />hole is open below the bottom of the casing <br />and no packers are in the hole. The lower <br />waters that may exist in the well are <br />commingled. <br />P.9 No.7 Well 17B is not artisan and has never been <br />known to flow. A cap will be placed on the <br />well and it will be continued to be used as a <br />monitoring well. <br />P.9 No.B Oakridge has only one permitted well which is <br />• Well 82-4. The current and proper permit <br />number is 31082F. The other permit numbers <br />are obsolete numbers issued for the same well. <br />No other wells have been drilled and none of <br />the permits are linked or associated with PW- <br />1. <br />P.9 No.l A post mining drainage plan has been shown on <br />the final contour map included in the map <br />section. <br />P.10 No.2 The wording in the Mine Plan section was <br />modified to reflect that Oakridge will obtain <br />the necessary DMG approvals for modifications <br />to the mine plan. <br />P.10 No.3 An air emissions permit will be obtained in <br />the near future and included as a part of the <br />permit process. <br />P.10 No.4 A variance from the approximate original <br />contour was submitted to the Division under <br />• separate cover. <br />