My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR13081
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
3000
>
APPCOR13081
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:33:23 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:37:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981034
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
4/28/1981
Doc Name
GRAND MESA PERMIT APPLICATION FN C-034-81
From
MLR
To
GRAND MESA COAL CO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page Nine <br />Preliminary Adequacy Review <br />Grand Mesa Coal Co. - Red Canyon Mine <br />April 28, 1981 <br />3. Yellow sweetclover is a highly competitive species and as such can tend <br />to inhibit establishment of the desirable perennial species in the seedmix. <br />The applicant should propose an alternative legume(s) such as titer milkvetch, <br />Utah sweetvetch, or lupine. <br />4. In light of the post-mining land use of wildlife habitat, it is recommended <br />that at least two or three forb species be included in the permanent seedmix. <br />Also,atleastorie forb species should be included in the temporary mix. <br />5. Rabbitbrush and sagebrush are both very light seeded species, and as such <br />the seeding rates of 2 pounds per acre is quite high. Seeding rates for <br />all species should be expressed on a pure live seed number per square foot <br />basis as well as pure live seed pounds per acre. The inclusion of rabbit- <br />brush in the seedmix is questionable. Unless the applicant can document a <br />need for the high seeding rates for rabbitbrush and sagebrush, the Division <br />recommends a reduction in the seeding rate for sagebrush, and removal of <br />rabbitbrush from the mix. Recommended alternative shrub species might <br />includefourwing salt rush winterfat, and antelope bitterbrush. <br />6. The revised seedmix should be expressed on a PLS/sq. ft. and PLS pounds <br />per acre basis. Scientific names should be included for the species to <br />be planted, and particular varieties should be specified when available. <br />2.05.4(2)(e)(iii) Planting and Seeding Methods <br />The applicant should be more specific regarding which slopes and other areas <br />will be drill-seeded and which will be broadcast-seeded. fdhat slopes would <br />be considered too steep for drill-seeding? Now will seedbed preparation <br />and seed coverage be accomplished on these sites? Are any erosion control <br />measures proposed? The applicant should address seeding rates for broadcast- <br />seeding and specify the methods and seedling distribution to be used in' <br />planting juniper and pinyon seedlings. <br />2.05.4(2)(e)(iv) Mulching <br />The applicant states that, in the hydroseeding operation, wood fiber mulch <br />will be mixed with the seed for distribution. This is not acceptable. <br />Mulch should be applied in a separate operation to allow for maximum contact <br />between the seed and the soil. <br />2.05.4(2)(e)(vi) Revegetation Success <br />I. The vegetation baseline study outlines in section 2.04.10 of the application <br />is not entirely appropriate. The applicant will be required to redesign <br />the sampling program to meet the performance standards of 4.15.7. The pre- <br />viously conducted vegetation study consisted of a number of rather poorly <br />defined "study sites" of unspecified size and location. Sampling methods <br />used were not specified. Sample adequacy was not addressed. Apparently, <br />many of these study sites were located in areas of previous, and continuing, <br />disturbance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.