My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR13073
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
3000
>
APPCOR13073
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:33:23 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:37:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
3/6/1996
Doc Name
BOWIE 2 MINE GEOTECHNICAL ADEQUACY COMMENTS PN C-96-083
From
DMG
To
TONY WALDRON
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.04.5 General Description of Hydrology and Geology <br />Referer~ces to other permit sections. No adequacy comment. <br />2.04.6 Geology Description <br />The general geology and structural geology discussions presented in this section <br />are faii:hful renditions of previously published descriptions of the regional <br />geology. Further the geological hazards mapping presented was performed by <br />Raye Junge of the Colorado Geological Survey. A geological map, a geological <br />hazard; map, and geological cross sections of the permit area are provided. <br />On page 2-04-14, under the "Structural Geology" heading, Bowie Resources <br />Limited (BRL) states; "There is one indicated fault that crosses the southwest <br />corner of the permit area." My examination of Maps 05, 06 and 07, and the <br />geologic cross section included on Map 08, could not discern the location of the <br />fault in question. BRL should clarify the fault's location on the geologic maps <br />and cross sections. As BRL is aware, the Bowie No. 1 (previously the Orchard <br />Valley mine) encountered a number of faults with 5 to 25 foot throws within <br />the upper D-seam which necessitated ramping, particularly within the east <br />mine workings. Faulting of this sort can become a significant consideration for <br />the operating cost of an underground mine. A thorough aerial photographic <br />analysis of the permit and adjacent area might assist in defining the location of <br />potential faults. <br />A brief discussion of the acid generating potential of the Upper B and Upper D <br />coal seams are presented in the text. Supporting chemical analyses are <br />referenced within Exhibit 6 of volume III. Page 2-04-18 of the application <br />states; "It is likely that lime is present in adequate quantities to neutralize the <br />acid forming component in the coal." The limited geochemical analyses of the <br />coal seams provided within Exhibit 6 of Volume III show the Upper B-Seam to <br />vary from 0.4% to 0.01% (average 0.145%) dry weight pyritic sulfur. This data <br />also shows the Upper D-Seam to vary from 0.05% to 0.01 % (average 0.027%) dry <br />weight pyritic sulfur. The data included within Exhibit 6 regarding occurrence <br />of calcium shows minimal amounts of soluble Calcium and Magnesium to be <br />present. in the roof and floor rock. No Calcium or Magnesium data is provided for <br />the two coal seams. No anion analyses, such as carbonate, or acid/base <br />potential determinations are provided for any of the coal., floor or roof <br />materials. I cannot find a basis for BRL's belief that sufficient lime is present <br />within the coal to negate the formation of acid within these coal seams. BRL <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.