APPCOR13017 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-z- All pertinent ground water level and ground water quality data (1.e. all available historic data from sampling points that are included in the applicant's proposed Hydrologic Monitoring Plan) should be compiled into the present permit application. ~ ~ ~a~l` ~~ 3. Ground water monitor well 08-FM-6 15~ identified on Map 4 as an a~luv~a-1 aquifer monitor well. This well 15 Identified as a deep aquifer monitor well in Table A of Exhibit 15 (Hydrologic Monitoring Plan). Th15 discrepancy should be corrected. If this well is a dual completion, it should be identified as such. 4. A typographic error on page 2.04-41 of volume 1 may ]ead the reader to e e some confusion 1n calculating the recharge rate of the overburden aquifer. ~~I~ k' The amount of water available for ground water recharge should be 3.2 inches ~/~33;c~ti^"~"`" per year, not .2 Inches as it appears on page 2.04-41. v~,,,~}~ 5. Aground water level hydrograph for alluvial aquifer monitor well 08-AU-4 is plotted in figure 6 (Volume 2). No data exists for this well 1n the permit application (except for the drtll log to Exhibit 1) and it is not plotted on a map within the permit application. Please explain the current status of this ~~~ ~,~~ well . ~„t~ ~'Y 6. The applicant should include 1n the permit application well construction ,p,W summaries for all monitor well completions that are identified in Table A of !V the Hydrologic Monitoring Plan (Exhibit 15). This information should include ~ ~' ~ well depths, design (including perforated intervals), completion dates, and I~I~ surface elevations. ~1'• ~y'Im , (~ 7. What is the reference point for ground water level measurements tabulated ~~iQ• in the "Depth" column 1n Table 26? Ground surface? Top of well casingi U° ..,~fyree ~ 8. Tables 26, 28, 29, and 30 are not clearly labeled. A header page is needed for each of these tables. Also, the parameters at the top of each page ` are difficult to see due to binding of the document. ~+IC1~ ~ B. Surface Water Information ~w/A~~~ 1. On page 2.04-48 and 2.04-49 of the permit application tt is stated that /- stream flow records (reduced to mean monthly discharge) from three stream ~I~ gaging stations on Foidel, Middle and Fish Creeks are summarized in Table 28, ~ i~' 1 ~i Surface Water Monitoring Data. These data do not appear 1n Table 28 of this ~' permit application. However, historic stream flow data (through 1980) for 1~ r u~r~ these three gaging stations can be found in Table y?g of th• original Energy ~ Nine No. 3 permit application submitted by Energy Fuels Corporation to ~ Z'~ ,~tJ'~ S February, 1981 (CNLRD file No. C-036-81). All available stream flow data for ~S~ the gaging stations included 1n the proposed hydrologic monitoring plan ,k (Exhibit 15) should be presented 1n the permit application. Specifically, O~TH data from USGS gaging stations 09243700 and 09243900 should be provided and should include both historic and current stream flow records for these sites. the Division cannot overstress the importance of comptling all existing water monitoring information into one document to facilitate the review process.