My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR12988
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
2000
>
APPCOR12988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:33:19 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:36:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1984062
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
2/7/1984
Doc Name
ADEQUACY REVIEW CYCC ENERGY 3 MINE
From
MLRD
To
SANDY EMRICH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />David H. Getches, Executive Director <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />DAVID C. SHEITON, Director <br />Richartl D. Lamm <br />Governor <br />DATE: February 7, 1984 <br />T0: .Sandy Emrich <br />FROM: P.C. Saletta ~]~, <br />RE: Adequacy Review - CYCC Energy No. 3 Mtne <br />Pursuant to your request I have reviewed the CYCC Energy No. 3 Mine Permit <br />application. The following comments are made on each of the sections of the <br />permit which I reviewed. <br />Grading and Backfilling <br />Portal Pit Area <br />The application states the applicant's intent to backfill the abandoned Middle <br />Creek Mtne portal pit according to cross sections submitted on Map No. 13. <br />Some previous concern was expressed as to whether the materials density tests <br />were adequate. It is apparent that the tests performed which Indicate a swell <br />factor of 26X can be verified by the applicant's and the Division's experience <br />in the Twenty Mile Park Basin. I believe the 26X swell factor 1s adequate. <br />More importantly, however, I am concerned with the volume of material in the <br />stockpile that will be used as the spoils backfill. The applicant states that <br />approximately 1,128,000 bank cubic yards will be needed to backfill the ,portal <br />pit, only 986,000 cubic yards are available with a deficit of 142,000 cubic <br />yards. <br />The 986,000 cubic yards is presumably loose material from the overburden <br />stockpiles to the north and west of the portal pit. F15t of all there are no <br />calculations to verify how much material is stockpiled. Secondly there is no <br />mention of grading technique with regard to compaction effort or lift height. <br />This concern is primarily to address the problem of saturation due to ground <br />water inflow. Minimizing permeability and porosity will substantially <br />decrease the volume of water saturating the backfilled pit. <br />The applicant intends to scrape overburden material surrounding the pit area <br />to make up for the deficit 142,000 BCY. This presents no major environmental <br />or engineering concern provided that grading and backfilling conform to the <br />design as presented in the permit cross sections on Map 13 of the permit <br />application. The applicant also states that a survey will be performed to <br />ensure approximation of contouring as designed. <br />423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />~~~ I~~I~~I~~II~~ I~~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.