Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~.. <br />^~ <br />Mr. Self <br />June 9, 1980 <br />Page 3 <br />indicated that no prime farmlands existed within the permit area, <br />this section was found to be in compliance with the final regulations. <br />III. Operations and Reclamation Plan (Section 4 of the application) <br />30 CFR 784 - State Equivilent Proposed Rule 2.04. <br />1. Section 4.1 - Operations Plan. <br />This entire section is in compliance with the final regulations. <br />2. Section 4.2 - Reclamation Plan. <br />This entire section is in compliance with the final regulations <br />with the exception of Section 4.2.5 - Reference Areas. Prior to <br />approval under the final program, the applicant will need to demon- <br />strate that [he reference area currently selected reference all <br />different vegetation types and significant environmental variables, <br />are representative of these various conditions and will allow for <br />rigorous statistical comperison in judging the success of revegeta- <br />tion as specified in the final regulations. <br />3. Section 4.3 - Protection of the Hydrologic Balance. <br />Section 4.3.3, the sediment control plan was found to be in com- <br />pliance with the final regulations. The remainder of Section 4.3 <br />was only reviewed with respect to the interim regulations. The <br />yroundwater monitoring plan is still under review and the results <br />of this review with respect to compliance will be forwarded to you <br />when available. The staff geo-hydrologist has previously expressed <br />his concerns to Darry Ferguson with respect to the placement of <br />wells in the alluvial monitoring program for the Williams Fork River <br />alluvium. As previously mentioned, the Division will need to review <br />the results of the hydrologic monitoring program before being able <br />to make determinations of compliance under the final regulations with <br />respect to groundwater and surface water control and probable hydro- <br />logic consequences. At this point in time, there are no well defined <br />criteria for making determinations of cumulative hydrologic effects; <br />when such criteria becomes defined, they will be applied to the <br />review of this application during the re-permitting process. <br />4. Section 4.4 - Post-mining Land Use is in compliance with the final <br />regulations. <br />5. Section 4.5 - General Facilities Plan is in compliance with the <br />final regulations. <br />6. Subsidence Control Survey. <br />No finding of compliance with final regulations was made with respect <br />to the subsidence control plan. This section will be revisited <br />during the re-permitting process. <br />7. Protection of Fish and Wildlife is in compliance with the final <br />regulations. <br />8. Section 4.8 - Transportation Facilities <br />This section of the application was only reviewed with respect to <br />interim regulations. At the time of re-permitting under the final <br />program, the requirements of 30 CFR 784.24 (State equivilen[ proposed <br />Rule 2.05.3(3)), will need to be addressed (specifically, specifica- <br />tions for each road width, road gradient, road surface etc.). <br />