My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR12805
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
2000
>
APPCOR12805
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:33:11 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:34:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
12/2/1982
Doc Name
SENECA II-O COMPLETENESS REVIEW
From
MLRD
To
JIM HERRON
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />-2- <br />The applicant has not provided a plan for stream channel <br />reconstruction at the minesite in accordance with Rule 4.05.4. <br />To complete the application, a plan for stream channel <br />reconstruction in accordance with Rule 4.05.3 (Ephemeral <br />drainages less than on square mile), or Rule 4.05.4 (all other <br />drainages) whichever is approptlate. The plan should identify <br />the flow regieme and area of each stream to be reconstructed, <br />show the location of the reconstructed channel on a map, <br />identify whether natural channel dimensions or a design event <br />would be used to size the channel, and identify if structural <br />controls would be used to prevent erosion. In accordance with <br />Rule 2.05.3(4)(a)(i)(E), the applicant may submit a general <br />plan with the permit application and provide the detailed <br />design plan at a later time. <br />Rule 2.05.6(3) Protection of the Hvdrolocic Balance <br />The applicant has not provided a discussion of probable <br />hydrologic consequences for the haul road corridor. <br />The applicant should provide a brief paragraph discussing the <br />hydrologic effects of the activities in the haul road corridor. <br />Rule 2.06.8 Alluvial Vallev Floors <br />The alluvial valley floor information provided by the applicant <br />was limited to adjacent areas of Hubberaon Gulch and Dry <br />Creek. Adjacent areas of Sage Creek and areas in or adjacent <br />to the haul toad corridor were not included. <br />The applicant should provide a reconnaissance level alluvial <br />valley floor investigation for Sage Creek and fox areas in or <br />adjacent to the haul road corridor. <br />During the course of my completeness review, I have noted a few <br />items that may have to be addressed during adequacy.The <br />applicants discussion of probable hydrologic consequences <br />should include additional quantitative analysis to support its <br />conclusions. Additional effects, such as effects on springs, <br />should be included in the assessment. Additional information <br />may be necessary to make the required alluvial valley floor <br />findings. <br />A complete list of my additional concerns must wait until an <br />adequacy review can be performed. The preliminary adequacy <br />review for this operation will take a minimum time of two <br />weeks. If you have any questions concerning this review, feel <br />free to ask. <br />/ys <br />cc: Brian Munson <br />Jim Pendleton <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.