My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR12798
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
2000
>
APPCOR12798
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:33:11 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:34:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1987072
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
3/4/1987
Doc Name
LA PLATA COAL PRELIMINARY ADEQUACY REVIEW
From
MLRD
To
PETER OCONNOR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-3- <br />Alluvial Valley Floors (2.06.81 <br />The Division, in reviewing and approving the National King Coal Mine <br />permit determined that Hay Gulch is an alluvial valley floor (AVF), <br />This finding was reiterated upon the issuance of the Proposed Findings <br />of Compliance for the adjacent Blue Flame Coal Mine. Based upon these <br />findings, the applicant should revise the application to delete <br />reference to the "possible" Hay Gulch AVF throughout the Permit <br />Application. <br />As the applicant indicates on page 2.06-5, the Division is concerned <br />about potential affects to the quality of the water within the Hay <br />Gulch alluvial aquifer when water which is detained in the sediment <br />pond infiltrates into the AYF, To alleviate these concerns, the <br />applicant should (A) develop and present to the Division for approval a <br />plan for sealing the sediment pond to minimize infiltration into the <br />Hay Gulch alluvial aquifer; (B) develop a plan to monitor the Hay Gulch <br />alluvial aquifer immediately down-gradient from the sediment pond. <br />This plan, when submitted to the Division for approval, should include, <br />but not be limited to, a) proposed well location; b) a diagram <br />depicting proposed well completion methods and materials; c) a proposed <br />method of determining aquifer transmissivity in the vicinity of the <br />well; d) a detailed description of a quarterly monitoring program which <br />should include a proposal to measure depth-to-water and the specific <br />water quality parameters proposed to be monitored. <br />3, The applicant may delete its commitments to specifically defining depth <br />and width of the alluvium, (the thickness of the aquifer must be known <br />to calculate transmissivity), and the storativity of the aquifer. The <br />applicant should define "depth of molthing" (p. 2.06-5). <br />Acid-Forming and Toxic-Forming Spoil (4.05.8) <br />1. The applicant states that no acid-forming or toxic-forming materials <br />exist at the La Plata Number 1 Mine site (page 4.05-6). Given that no <br />geochemical information has been supplied by the applicant, this <br />statement appears to be unsubstantiated. Upon satisfying Preliminary <br />Adequacy Review comments 2.04.6(2) and (3), an evaluation of potential <br />acid-forming and toxic-forming materials can be made by the applicant. <br />Upon evaluation of the geochemical data, the applicant should <br />completely address Rule 4.05.8. <br />Subsidence (2.05.6, 4.20.1) <br />1. The operator has performed an inventory of the overlying area (affected <br />area), and has determined that no renewable resource lands or <br />structures exist above the proposed mine. <br />The operator has proposed a three point subsidence monitoring program <br />in Section 29 of the permit area. Each subsidence monument will be <br />located over an area of coal extraction. In order to determine the <br />relative movement of each subsidence monument, it is a commonly <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.