My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR12507
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
2000
>
APPCOR12507
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:32:55 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:31:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981033
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
12/29/1981
Doc Name
REVIEW OF THE REVISED BEAR MINE PERMIT APPLICATION
From
MLR
To
DAN MATHEWS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />STATE OF COLORADO R~CNeRDD ISM M. Governor <br />DEPART MENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />D. MOnle Pascoe. Executive Director <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION <br />423 Centennial Budding, 1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (3031 866-3567 <br />Davld C. Shelton <br />Director <br />December 29, 1982 <br />TO: Dan Mathews <br />FROM: Jim Pendleton `_ " <br />RE: Review of "Slp e St Ii ty Analysis, West Portal Area - <br />Bear Mine" (~ e 2 of 2 - Dear COa1 Company Permit Application) <br />Pursuant to your request, I have reviewed the supplemental submittal by Bear <br />Coal Company, entitled "Slope Stability Analysis, [Jest Portal Area - Bear <br />Mine". I forward the following comments for your consideration. <br />The western portal set of the Dear mine exists within an ancient landslide <br />compler.. Slope morpholoyy of this type is more the rule than the exception <br />for the valley of the North Fork of tJ~e Gunnison, <br />The stability analysis performed by Rocky Mountain Geotechnical is a <br />sensitivity-type anal~ISis which considered a range of material strengths <br />and alternative backfill and grading configurations, Aaterial strength prop- <br />erties were determined for both highwall materials and existing bench fill <br />materials. The analysis also assumed that a lirrdCed perched water table <br />might develop within the "toe of the existing fill bench, but that no true <br />phreatic condition would develop, because of steep slope grades and relatively <br />impermeable backfill materials. This is probably a valid assumption if <br />drainage is precluded from the portals into the backfilled bench. I recommend <br />that you request Roy .Cox re vi eta the hydrology aspects of their abandonment <br />plan to determine whether or not drainage will, indeed, occur. <br />Briefly summarized, the stability analysis projects that a backfilled static <br />slope safety factor of 1,3 or greater can be achieved in two manners: <br />(1) The existing portal highwall could be partially backfilled (approximately <br />half its existing height would be covered); or <br />(2) The existing portal highwall could be totally backfilled if a supporting <br />buttress toe berm was constructed throughout the length of the existing bench, <br />approximately 20 feet high by 30 feet wide. <br />The partially backfilled configuration achieves a static slope safety factor of <br />1.3 only if we assume an internal angle of friction of 4I° or higher for the <br />highwall materials. This value is higher than the laboratory test determined <br />value of 33,7° for effective peak stress and should, therefore, involve monitor- <br />ing of the final backfilled configuration to assure stability. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.