My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR12443
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
2000
>
APPCOR12443
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:32:52 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:30:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
5/31/1996
Doc Name
BOWIE RESOURCES LIMITED BOWIE 2 MINE FN C-96-083 NEW PERMIT APPLICATION
From
DMG
To
J E STOVER & ASSOCIATES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />J.E. Stover & Associates -23- May 31, 1996 <br />Bowie No. 2 Mine <br />waste pile toe is within 150 feet of the right-of-way of old <br />State Highway 133, it might compromise the drainage facilities <br />adjoining that highway and subject the public to an health and <br />safety risk. <br />In consideration of the potential risk, BRL should obtain samples <br />of each of the three earthen material for which WESTEC assumed <br />strength parameters and determine those properties by appropriate <br />laboratory testing. In the case of the Mancos Shale (material <br />"3") and the old coal mine refuse (material "4"), tests should be <br />performed in both saturated and unsaturated conditions to <br />determine the effect of ground water saturation. Sensitivity- <br />style stability analyses can then be completed to determine the <br />possible effect of unanticipated saturation of the subject <br />materials. <br />2.05.4 Reclamation Plan <br />2.05.4(2)(c) Backfilling and Grading <br />71. BRL states that it will reclaim the mine facilities area, <br />haul road and conveyor corridor by returning the borrowed <br />material from fill slopes to cut slopes. For all the roads, <br />benches and surface facility disturbances at this <br />challenging site, BRL will have to propose specific <br />reclaimed configurations. Cuts and embankments proposed to <br />be retained as part of the reclaimed configuration will have <br />to be analyzed to demonstrate their structural and <br />geomorphic stability. The stability of backfilled <br />facilities will also require analysis, at least of typical <br />situations. In potentially unstable sites, simply <br />backfilling cuts to original configuration may not result in <br />a stable surface. Because of the unique peak strength <br />versus ultimate strength relationships commonly <br />characteristic of landslide-prone materials, once disturbed <br />the placement and recompaction of these materials may not <br />recover their original pre-disturbance strength. <br />Particular attention will also have to focus upon the <br />drainage of reclaimed areas and facilities, because of the <br />deleterious effects of introduction of water to landslide <br />landforms. In the case of the Mount Gunnison No. 1 mine, <br />stability analyses determined that many of the retaining <br />walls along roadways and portal bench cuts need to be <br />backfilled in place to attain stable final reclaimed slopes. <br />72. Referring to map No. 18, Postmining Topography, and map no. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.