My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR12443
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
2000
>
APPCOR12443
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:32:52 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:30:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
5/31/1996
Doc Name
BOWIE RESOURCES LIMITED BOWIE 2 MINE FN C-96-083 NEW PERMIT APPLICATION
From
DMG
To
J E STOVER & ASSOCIATES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a i <br />J.E. Stover & Associates -22- May 31, 1996 <br />Bowie No. 2 Mine <br />4.1.5 Material Balance/Material Stockpiles <br />WESTEC requests that the topsoil stockpile just east of the toe <br />of the waste pile, and the coverfill stockpile located 600 east <br />of the toe of the waste pile, be exempted from sediment control <br />and considered small area exemptions. BRL also proposes to <br />build the haul road to the waste pile without a sediment control <br />facility. Further, BRL requests a variance because a portion of <br />these facilities lie within 100 feet of the Right-of-Way for old <br />State Highway 133. Old Highway 133 appears to provide access for <br />several of the neighboring residents as well as the Bowie No. 2 <br />mine. If Highway 133 were compromised emergency access might be <br />eliminated to the mine and the neighbors. BRL will have to <br />provide detail concerning the existing drainage conveyances along <br />and under old Highway 133 to demonstrate that changes within the <br />mine permit area, which affect water retention and routing will <br />not overload the existing ditches and culverts and compromise the <br />old Highway. Further, BRL will have to specify which alternative <br />sediment control devices and techniques will be implemented and <br />at what specific locations. <br />4.3 Slope Stability <br />4.3.2 Material Properties <br />WESTEC considered four earthen materials in completing its slope <br />stability analysis for the proposed waste pile. Strength <br />parameters for the coal waste, material '1" were determined by <br />performing a direct shear test in the laboratory. Strength <br />parameters for existing sandstone-derived colluvial material <br />underlying the proposed waste pile, material "2", were <br />theoretically developed from interpretation of the Standard <br />Penetration Test (SPT) blowcounts recorded in the field. <br />Strength parameters for the Mancos Shale bedrock, material "3', <br />were similarly deduced from SPT blowcounts. Strength parameters <br />for the historic coal mine waste fill material located beneath <br />the toe of the waste pile, material "4", were also deduced from <br />SPT blowcount conversions. <br />WESTEC's stability analysis of the proposed Bowie No. 2 mine's <br />coal waste pile determined the overall static slope stability <br />safety factor of the structure to be 1.54. The corresponding <br />pseudostatic factor of safety, assuming a pseudostatic horizontal <br />acceleration factor of 0.1 g was calculated at 1.14. This <br />calculated static safety factor narrowly exceeds the required <br />value of 1.5. If the ultimate waste pile volume, in excess of <br />225,000 cubic yards of combined waste, coverfill and topsoil were <br />to fail, it could compromise the function and integrity of the <br />sediment pond adjacent to the waste pile toe. Further, since the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.