Laserfiche WebLink
Laborat~y data has been <br />elan fo~soils that dill <br />in ttie Eck:man Park area. <br />Tab Le <br />71, 74, 75, 76, 77, 7S <br />71 <br />72 <br />72 <br />71 <br />~i1, 72, 73, 78 <br />71, 73 <br />71 <br />72 <br />71, 74, 75, 76, 77 <br />oresente n the mine <br />be distur d by miring <br />Soil t^.ap L'nits <br />Aaberg silty clay 35 D, 35 E <br />.~.bor silty clay loam 4 C, 4 E <br />Sucks?;in loam 2 C <br />2~uckley silty <br />clay loam 10 ~' , 10 F <br />Gapo clay loam 23 P. <br />Routt loam 2 VD <br />SF;vlick loam 23 A <br />Sk;}^~ay loam 70 D, 70 F <br />Unnamed-Cochetopa <br />complex 2 :l~ <br />ldinevada-Splitro <br />complex X S D, X 8 F <br />Typical soil profile descriptions and map unit descrip- <br />tions are present in the mine plan for all of the soils <br />occurring within the mine plan area except: <br />Crvoborolls-Rock Outcrop comples, Torriorthents- <br />Rock Outcrop cor..plex, and Skyeaay loam. These <br />descriptions adequately describe the soils in the <br />mine plan area. <br />The parameters analyzed and the classifications for <br />top soil suitability were determined by following <br />the fJvoming Department of Environmental Quality <br />Guidelines as shown in Table 80. Table 7° presents <br />topsoil suitability ratings. :Io laboratory data <br />is presented to substantiate the suitability ratings <br />for the following soils: <br />Aaber~ - t•?aybe cot:plex <br />Abor - Moyerson complex <br />Sipco silty clay loam <br />Cochetopa loma <br />Coutis fine sandy loam <br />Roxa1 Variant - Lymanson <br />Venable loam <br />Storman complex <br />Suitability ratings for soils having laboratory data <br />were determined by comparing parameter ranges with <br />D.D.Q. guidelines Table 80. <br />1. pH; Soils analyzed have good to fair pH <br />values except 2 samples of Aaberg <br />silty clay B horizon (pH 5.3-5.4 poor). <br />Mixing of the subsoils; however, should <br />dilute this low pH soil. <br />