APPCOR12195

• Permit No: C1981031
• IBM Index Class Name: Application Correspondence
• Doc Date: 9/30/1983
• Doc Name: STIPULATION NOS. 6 & 10 RESPONSES
• From: J F SATO & ASSOCIATES
• To: MLRD
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

This table replaces the table on page 166 of the original
permit. Also, note that the "1982-83" notation for the pits has
been updated to "1983-84" to more accurately reflect the mining
schedule (Figure 6.1). Similar notation changes apply to the
narrative in the permit and the original maps. Utilizing the
thicknesses and the areas of the pits from Table 6.1 the
following volumes of soil are determined. Note that as per the
original permit application (pg. 258), a 20 foot buffer around
the pit area has been included.
TABLE 6.2 Soil volumes
Mine area Soil Area, Topsoil Volume, Subsoil Volume,
type acres thickness, cubic thickness, cubic
inches ards inches ards
1 83 LTE 0 1 6, 0
1984A LTE 4.98 4 2,680 14 9,380
TM 1.92 15 3,870 45 11,610
Totals ~~ 11~6b 7, 0
1984B LTE 3.80 4 2,040 10 5,100
1984C LTE 3.43 4 1,840 10 4,600
B,C Totals 7T. f3 3~d ~,7~0
The soil handling plan as discussed in the Permit will not
change except in terms of the operation planned and the handling .
of small spoil piles that are dispersed over the permit area.
The latter problem will be handled by staking the spoil areas in
the field before any topsoil in the vicinity is removed. The
scraper operator will carefully remove the spoil and it shall be
placed directly in the. pit being reclaimed so that the spoil
will be covered by at least one lift of overburden before being
covered by subsoil and then topsoil. The spoil in the small
piles is primarily burnt material, which is typically
essentially inert. The removal of these small piles can be done
with a minimal loss of topsoil, thus no adjustment to the
volumes in Table 6.1 is proposed.