Laserfiche WebLink
f~ <br />• <br />Three <br />Soils Information <br />• <br />A soils map is now included, however it is illegible, therefore a usable <br />copy which includes a scale and a legend, must be submitted. A descrip- <br />tion of soil mapping unit l0I-F which occurs in the permit area (accord- <br />ing to Plate 9, page 58, Mine Plan, October 1980) should be submitted. <br />Additionally, the applicant must supply information on the present and <br />potential productivity of the soil units within those portions of the <br />permit area to be affected by surface operations. <br />The amount of suitable topsoil used in revegetation and the adequacy <br />of this material needs to be more clearly addressed. The applicant <br />states that approximately 2000 cubic yards will be needed to cover the <br />portal bench and access roads with four inches of topsoil (Mine Plan, <br />page 73, October 1980); however, preliminary calculations indicate <br />that up to 9000 to 10,0000 cubic yards will be required for the four <br />inch depth for these two areas. A clarification of the topsoil volumes <br />individually required for the portal bench, access roads, reservoir, <br />coal stockpile, coal stockpile sedimentation ponds, and truck scale <br />areas must be submitted. Handling and use of topsoil in the area of <br />the road and the ephemeral stream should be clarified. Soil testing <br />parameters should be identified. Any toxic materials which are to be <br />buried must also be identified. <br />The acreage involved for each area should be identified in relation to <br />bonding calculations. The calculations used in determining grading, <br />packing, replacement, and preparation costs for the performance bond <br />should be explained in more detail. If a much greater quantity of top- <br />soil is required than what has been projected, the bond may have to be <br />adjusted. <br />Clarification is needed on how grading of the reservoir and sediment pond <br />will take place of if there is enough material to return these areas to <br />their original contour. There is no mention in the plan of ripping and <br />discing of the areas to be resoiled as required. A discussion of equip- <br />ment to be used should also be provided. <br />Vegetation Information <br />Reference areas or other approved standards for measuring revegetation <br />success must be established. Reference areas have not been mentioned in <br />the permit applications. In addition, the vegetation study area as iden- <br />tified in Exhibit A of the second mine and reclamation plan application <br />(which was received at OSM on October 27, 1980) appears to be inadequate <br />in that it appears to be less than two acres. Reference areas must be <br />at least three acres in size. <br />The existing environment of the proposed entrance area is described in <br />Exhibits I and J (page 6) of the Mine Plan (May 21, 1979) and by Bruce <br />Fowler (EA prepared for the USDI, page 19) as a brushy loam range site. <br />The dominant plant species are oak and service berry. The area beneath <br />the easements area described in the USFS's EA as being unusable for range. <br />Common plants include yucca, grams, needle-and-thread, cactus, and pinyon- <br />juniper overstory. Hubbard Canyon contains oak, boxelder, Douglas-fir, <br />and cottonwood. This appears to be contradictory information and should <br />be clarified. <br />